Converging trials with and without conditions into one Trial List...!!!

[Dilip Kumar]

Hi David,

I'm already using the procedure you said. I have a master list as a top 
layer for two procedures Control and WM each having a weight of 30 with 
random selection. Each procedure has a sub list with 30 of trials namely 
Control & WM Trial List. Each sub list has a trial procedure with and 
without condition. The randome

I am supposed to get random trial from this setup, which I believe am 
getting but I am not sure about that. Due to the usage of IFIS paradigm 
design wizard, the trial run does not completes all 60 trails. It only runs 
for random 17 trials and asks for continuing or end the trial. It restarts 
the trial cycle if I continue or ends. I'm not sure how do I cope with this 
situation. Any suggestions would be quite helpful. 

Best Regards,
Dilip 



On Tuesday, July 1, 2014 3:57:09 AM UTC+8, McFarlane, David wrote:
>
> Dilip, 
>
> Perhaps I do not understand this fully, but couldn't you just use one 
> List with that contains both tasks, and use the Procedure attribute 
> to indicate which task (Control or WM) runs on any trial? 
>
> ----- 
> David McFarlane 
> E-Prime training 
> online:  http://psychology.msu.edu/Workshops_Courses/eprime.aspx 
> Twitter:  @EPrimeMaster (https://twitter.com/EPrimeMaster) 
>
> /---- 
> Stock reminder:  1) I do not work for PST.  2) PST's trained staff 
> take any and all questions at https://support.pstnet.com , and they 
> strive to respond to all requests in 24-48 hours, so make full use of 
> it.  3) In addition, PST offers several instructional videos on their 
> YouTube channel (http://www.youtube.com/user/PSTNET ).  4) If you do 
> get an answer from PST staff, please extend the courtesy of posting 
> their reply back here for the sake of others. 
> \---- 
>
>
> At 6/23/2014 11:45 PM Monday, Dilip Kumar wrote: 
> >I want to converge two tasks into one trial list in order to get 
> >random trial appearance. As can be seen in design attached, control 
> >task has only one slide object which acts as stimuli & response 
> >simultaneously (no condition) while WM task has two slide objects 
> >one being used as stimulus and other as condition & response medium. 
> > 
> >Of-course this in not a huge issue for experts in the group and I 
> >need some help in resolving it. Can someone please guide me on how 
> >should I go about converging the experiment at tabular list as well 
> >as on trial design level. Please do share your tips/tricks and 
> >suggestions on this issue. 
> > 
> >Thanks! 
> > 
> >Best regards, 
> > 
> >Dilip 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "E-Prime" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to e-prime+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to e-prime at googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/e-prime/ce046364-2a95-412a-9508-03da147046d4%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/eprime/attachments/20140701/2487353d/attachment.htm>