On Everett on Givon (on Everett)
Daniel Everett
dlevere at ilstu.edu
Mon Oct 8 11:57:36 UTC 2007
I replied to the Sinha and Silva posting on LinguistList on April 23,
2007.
I didn't mean to sound like Hale was the first person ever to have
the idea that parataxis leads to embedding. It has been around for a
while. Bloomfield even says some things about it.
But Ken's paper is in the generative tradition and that is where most/
all of the controversy about the claims that a language can lack
subordination/recursion come from. So it is particularly pertinent.
Best,
Dan
On 8 Oct 2007, at 06:49, Esa Itkonen wrote:
> In his reply to Givon, Dan Everett seems to be saying that Ken Hale
> was the first to claim (in 1976) that embedding/hypotaxis emerges
> from parataxis. I must have misunderstood him, but for the benefit
> of those who may be guilty of the same misunderstanding, I would
> like to add the following comment.
>
> Hermann Paul (1975 [1880]: 145) points out, first, that hypotaxis
> is generally thought to emerge from parataxis and, second, that
> this view (if meant to state the whole truth) is wrong:
> "Irrtuemlich ist ferner die gewoenliche Ansicht, dass die Hypotaxe
> durchgaengig aus der Parataxe entstanden sei." Thus, more than 100
> years before Ken Hale, most people thought what he thought, but
> Paul thinks that they are wrong. But how, then, can hypotaxis come
> into being, if not from parataxis? The answer is not blowing in the
> wind, but is, rather, mentioned in the title of my 2005 book
> (published by Benjamins).
>
> Paul adduces several cases of parataxis from his own speech. Surely
> Germany under Bismarck is a less-than-ideal example of a hunter-
> gatherer community. So those seem to be right who doubt the
> plausiblity of a very close correlation between linguistic
> structure and social structure.
>
> Another thing. In 1816, Franz Bopp started his historical-
> comparative work by assuming that the Indo-European verb contains
> the end results of two grammaticalization processes: from copula to
> tense marker and from pronoun to person suffix. This is explains
> why, for those who learned this in their first student year,
> grammaticalization is no big deal. Besides, more should be said
> about the emergence of ablaut (which fails to conform with the
> lexical > grammatical cline)
>
> To conclude, I have to mention an important contribution by Vera da
> Silva and Chris Sinha on how to teach the Pirahas to read and write
> (sic!). Perhaps expectedly, the New Yorker refused to publish it.
> Fortunately, however, it is to be be found in Linguist List and
> Cogling (in late April, I think).
>
> Esa Itkonen
>
> Reference
> Paul, Hermann (1975 [first ed. 1880, fifth ed. 1920]): Prinzipien
> der Sprachgeschichte. Tuebingen: Niemeyer.
>
>
> Homepage: http://users.utu.fi/eitkonen
More information about the Funknet
mailing list