voting
Lisa Camasi
lcamasi at UCLINK4.BERKELEY.EDU
Fri May 3 16:34:38 UTC 2002
Let's see. It's nearing the end of the semester here in the northern
hemisphere, which means exams to prepare for and papers to
write/evaluate. It's well past the middle of the 1st term in the southern
hemisphere too. Most of us are busy, have a tremendous amount of
administrative work to attend to and have lives away from our
professional/academic responsibilities as well. Such a minor oversight as
hitting the 'reply' button hardly seems to warrant such a rude and arrogant
indictment of a person's intelligence. It must have taken more effort to
write the post below than to just hit the 'delete' button the couple of
times required! As to the suggestion that ignorance somehow invalidate's
one's vote, the 2000 presidential election here in the US provides rather
robust evidence to the contrary.
Lisa Camasi
At 02:11 PM 5/3/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>It does say in the text not to send your vote to the whole
>mailing list : I don't particularly want my inbxo cluttered
>with your votes: surewly list members are intelligent
>enought to have read the message and realised this: this
>display of ignorance doesn't give much validation to your
>vote. Zoe Lloyd.
More information about the Gala-l
mailing list