Sheldon's question about "masculine women"
Rezenet Moges (cappucheeno@yahoo.com)
rmoges at CSULB.EDU
Tue Mar 25 18:20:06 UTC 2008
I chose the term "masculine women" as the category of my research
subjects. Yes, it is sometimes awkward to find the appropriate term
without discomforting anyone. In the continuum of the gender identity
between femininity and masculinity, as stated earlier, I will focus on the
women on the far end of masculinity. I am not focusing on their
sexuality; thus, I will not mention them as butch lesbians, dykes, studs,
or else. I will include heterosexual tomboys and girl-jocks in my study,
so I welcome all women of any sexual background but of specified gender
category with the presence of masculinity. Simultaneously, they need to
be native signers as well.
As a native signer myself, I find it difficult to settle on a single sign
for "masculine" without making any establishment or compounded sign. I
have seen several variations for that sign. The most popular sign for
that word resembles to "MACHO" or "BUTCH." If I was to be transliterate
in writing, it does not seem appropriate to write "
sign language, focused
on MACHO women." Would it?
In addition, all this is in its preliminary stages of research so I am
eager to hear any feedback. Thanks for your inquiry.
(I tried to post since last night, and am uncertain if there will be
repetitive posts. So please excuse this if it does.)
Rezenet Moges
Research Assistant,
Anthropology Department,
CSU, Long Beach
More information about the Gala-l
mailing list