[gothic-l] Re: Germanic Migrations

dirk at SMRA.CO.UK dirk at SMRA.CO.UK
Mon Nov 6 12:45:25 UTC 2000


Hi Philip,

my uncle was historian and professor of history who taught historic
methodology at university. If one of his students came to him to
propose Phd research on a prehistoric era, lets say the Battle Axe
People etc. he would refere him to the archaeological department. If a
historian starts studying grave goods,  he would no doubt need
specialist archaeological knowledge. Numismatics, ie. the study of
coins is an auxiliary dicipline of history.  There are always
multi-disciplinary approaches possible. Please remember this
discussion started as Bertil suggested that research by linguists is
of 'limited value' and that historians must take the first place in
the study of what are essentially pre-historic times. I say there is
no ranking of disciplines, multi-disciplinary approaches are possible
and you will find that a historian who wants to include pre-historic
sections in his research will more often than not have to rely on
archaeologists and linguists.

Dirk



--- In gothic-l at egroups.com, "Philip Rusche" <ruschep at n...> wrote:
> > every discipline must have an object of research. Historians study
> > written documents. No documents - no history, nothing much to do
for a
> >  historian. Can, in your view, a historian research the history of
the
> > Neandertals? Let me answer that for you: No, he/she can't, not
because
> > it is so far back in time, but because there are no written
documents.
> >  The same applies to any period which is 'pre-history'.
>
> This seems to me a fairly narrow definition of "historian."
Historians
> study many things besides written documents, e.g. coins, grave
goods, art,
> etc.  I especially think excluding archaeology from the field of
history
> would find little favor with historians, whether the period is
modern,
> medieval, or before written documents are preserved.  It doesn't
mean there
> aren't historians who study only written documents, but confining
the term
> to them seems overly limiting.
>
> Philip Rusche
> (who isn't a historian either)
>
>
>
> > I have indeed never heard of the 'big-history' concept. Do feel
free
> > to enligthen us. Especially, historians may be interested to hear
> > about that.
> >
> > As for my background, I am an academic with doctorate, so I am
> > familiar with scientific method, the discipline is not relevant
for
> > our dicussion. You have not given your  background either, i.e.
> > university degree and discipline. Just 'writer' can mean anything.
> > Also, in the past you have tended to attack the competency of
> > scientists, (like calling Dahl's books of limited value
etc.)instead
> > of their evidence, so I don't want to open myself to this line of
> > fire.
> >
> > Dirk
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In gothic-l at egroups.com, bertil <mvk575b at t...> wrote:
> > > Dirk,
> > >
> > > No, history deals with periods way
> > > behind the time when written records
> > > exist.
> > >
> > > The latest in this field is the so called
> > > "big history". It seems as if you are
> > > not quite abreast with the developments
> > > in this field which of course brings
> > > me back, even more curious, about your
> > > background. Let me at a future time return
> > > to the concept of "big history".
> > >
> > > Germanically
> > >
> > > Bertil
> > >
> > > > any student of history learns in his/her first lecture at
> > University
> > > > that  the field of study of an historian is the historic era
of
> > > > humankind. And that the historic era starts whenever first
> > contemprary
> > > > written sources appear for that particular culture. Historian
need
> > > > historical sources to study, if there are no historical
sources to
> > > > study, they have to rely on evidence and interpretations
supplied
> > by
> > > > archaelogists, linguists and other disciplines. A historian
would
> >
> > > > never try to write the history of pre-historic people. Perhaps
we
> > have
> > > > one or two historians on the list who could quickly confirm
that.
> >
> >
> >
> > You are a member of the Gothic-L list.  To unsubscribe, send a
blank email
> to <gothic-l-unsubscribe at egroups.com>.
> > Homepage: http://www.stormloader.com/carver/gothicl/index.html


-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/3/_/3398/_/973514731/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

You are a member of the Gothic-L list.  To unsubscribe, send a blank email to <gothic-l-unsubscribe at egroups.com>.
Homepage: http://www.stormloader.com/carver/gothicl/index.html



More information about the Gothic-l mailing list