[gothic-l] "hi-" pronoun
M.
mcarver at CSULB.EDU
Mon Sep 18 07:05:32 UTC 2000
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
0% Introductory APR!
Instant Approval!
Aria Visa - get yours today.
http://click.egroups.com/1/7102/8/_/3398/_/969260470/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
M N F
N. he' hit hi'
A. hin (o') hit (o') hijo'n
G. hesa hesa hezo's
D. himme', -o' himme', -o' hizai
I. hijae' hijae' hijae'
L. hi' hi'
hi's hijo' hijo's
hins hijo' hijo's
hi'zo'n hi'zo'n hi'zo'n
himiz himiz himiz
Above is the supposed Gmc. paradigm for the proximal demonstrative pronoun
"this". It is has been tentatively developed with assistance of attestation
to the following Gothic paradigm:
M N F
N. he' hita hei
A. hina hita hijo'n
G. his his hizo's
D. himma himma hizai
I. hije' hije' hije'
L. hei hei ?
heis hijo' hijo's
hins hijo' hijo's
heize' heize' heize'
him him him
The Goths used some of these forms, most notably "himma" in the phrase
"himma daga". Would they and/or did they use the paradigm as such? Need they
have used it, or did the simple demonstrative suffice as evidenced in such
archaic formulae?
Matthaius
You are a member of the Gothic-L list. To unsubscribe, send a blank email to <gothic-l-unsubscribe at egroups.com>.
Homepage: http://www.stormloader.com/carver/gothicl/index.html
More information about the Gothic-l
mailing list