[gothic-l] Gothic Archaeology was Re: Whence the Eruli

[Tore Gannholm]

>will yield. But I certainly won't hold my breath in
>>  the meantime. Nothing is absolutely certain in this
>>  world. But this is as certain as anything can be.*****
>>
>
>Dear George
>
>I completely agree with you and I think when considering different
>and opposing views it is useful to look at the history of the
>research on a certain question. Below I provide a summary of an
>article by J. Blischke, who provided an interesting overview of the
>history of archaeological research and interpretation of the problem
>of Gothic migration. The article is called "Die Wielbark-Kultur und
>die Problematik der Gotenwanderung", Archaeologische Informationen,
>19/1&2, 1996, pp. 117-23.
>
>The author states that attempts in the late 19th and early 20th
>century to identify the earliest continental seats of the Goths
>started from the premises that the migration legend as set out in the
>Getica represented absolute truth. This premises was introduced to
>archaeology by the germanist turned archaeologist Gustav Kossinna.
>Hence all early attempts to identify the Goths on the continent
>proceeded from  Scandinavian and in particular Gotlandic material
>cultures. Researchers tried to find analogies between Scandinavian
>and continental cultures in Pommern, West Prussia and East Prussia.
>
>Blischke explains that using this method Almgren (Mannus 5, 1913, pp
>147-51) was the first to be able to exclude the possibility that the
>Goths had come from Gotland. His findings were since confirmed by a
>series of other scholars. But since research was still founded on the
>premises that the Getica was correct, the emphasis now switched to
>Sweden, where the largely unresearched areas (in the early 20th
>century) provided wide room for manoeuvre for scholars like Nerman
>(Fornvaennen 18, 1923), Engel (Deutsche Ostforschung 1, 1942, pp 132-
>78) and Oxenstierna (Mannus 73, 1945) to pursue attempts to localise
>Goths on the continent based on a Scandinavian 'Urheimat' origin.
>


Dirk,
This is not quite true. Almgren could not find any emigration from
Gotland in the first century AD.
He could only find emigration from Gotland in the 3rd century BC but
no places in Poland at that time.

Further archaeological research has proven that the Wilbark culture
formed (as we have already stated on this forum) in the 3rd century
BC.

At that time there seems to have been very close contacts between the
Baltic coast areas including Gotland and the Wielbark original area.

read also Gothic connections
http://w1.855.telia.com/~u85528681/Gothic_l/gothicconnectio_/default.htm



Tore
--

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck
Monitoring Service trial
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ACHqaB/bQ8CAA/ySSFAA/wWMplB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

You are a member of the Gothic-L list.  To unsubscribe, send a blank email to <gothic-l-unsubscribe at egroups.com>.

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/