[gothic-l] Re: Romans 1-3 Reconstruction (*bruk-)
thiudans
thiudans at YAHOO.COM
Tue Oct 19 19:39:29 UTC 2004
--- In gothic-l at yahoogroups.com, "llama_nom" <600cell at f...>
wrote:
>
>
> Hails Maththaiu!
>
> In OE at least, bryce is a masc. ja-stem:
>
> BRYCE, brice, es; m. [brycst, brfcst, pres. of brucan to usi,
enjoy]
> Use, service, the occupation or exercise of a thing, profit,
> advantage, fruit; usus, rninisteriurn, conirnodurn :-- Gif <eth>æt
ówiht
> bry´ce wzs if thai was any use; si hoc aliquid prodesset, Bd. 5,
14;
> S. 634, 8, note. Láfe on hwylc hugu fatu gehiwade wæ-
acute;ron
> mennisces bryces recisuræ in vasa quælibet humani usus
formarentur,
> 3, 22; S. 552, 14. Brice o<eth><eth>e gewuna asus, Ælfc. Gr.
n; Som. 15, 16.
> Ealle wer<thorn>eóde lifga<thorn> bí <eth>ám lissum, <eth>e
éce Dryhten gesette sínum
> bearnum to brice all tribes of men live by the blessings, which
the
> eternal Lord bestowed on 'his children for their use, Exon. 54
b; Th.
> 193, 3; Az. 116. We sceoldon <eth>a hwílend-lícan <thorn>ing
to úrum brícum
> habban we should have transitory things for ' K
>
> (Bosworth & Toller)
>
> Aha, the advantage of doing corrections on these pages is that
I can
> now decypher some of the garbling!
>
> So yes, this does have has the right range of meanings, and
suggests
> Go. *brukeis. Except that NHG brauch & Nor. bruk (from Low
German,
> or native?) have no mutation. I wonder how early the word is
> recorded on the continent. But then palatal mutation isn't as
> thorough in some German dialects: cf. bruecke v. Innsbruck.
> Alternatively I wonder if the OE word could have changed
declension
> with the loss of -z, and perhaps correspond to a Go. *brukei??
Or,
> as you suggest, fi *bruks. Maybe a comparison with other
cognates
> will help. Something to think about...
>
> The adjective, by the way, is definitely an i-stem, rather than ja-,
> cf. Corinthians I 10:33 [A] <thorn>atei mis bruk sijai; Sk 4,3 so
bi ina
> garehsns du leitilamma mela raihtis bruks was. (Koebler's
dictionary
> sometimes implies doubt in cases like this were there is
none, e.g.
> skeirs, also i-stem, cf. Sk 4,4).
>
> Llama Nom
Hails!
Koebler calls bru'k-s = Adj. (i/ja) which is apparently just his way
of noting that -i- adjectives went mostly over to a ja- declension,
as Wright notes §233.
FFT is rather unenlightening on bru'k-, with a short paragraph of
verbal forms only. It would be interesting to compare the forms of
various members of the same verb class as brukjan and their
ablaut use in nouns and adjectives. This is similar to what I did
when trying to come up with another word for Romans 3,
"destruction, wreckage etc." from the verb brikan (IV) "break,
quarrel, fight". I am toying with (ga)brek or (ga)brauhts, though
(ga)breikei/ns might be safer...
Sv IV in Gothic:
i (ai) - a - e - u/au
niman - nem (nA) "taking", nems (i/jaA) "taking", nemeigs (aA)
"taking", numja (mN) "taker", numts (fI) "acceptance".
bairan - bar-ms (mI), bar-n (nA), ber-us-i/-jos, baurs (mI),
baurthei (fN) "burden, load", baurths (fI) "birth, child", gabaur
(nA), (mA)
brikan - brakja (fJO), brukja (mN), bruka (fO)
qiman - qumths (fI), qums (mI)
stilan - 0 [missing here is "stealth"]
gatiman - tim-r-, tim-b-r-; ?tams, (ga)tems [missing here is
"time"?]
trudan - 0 [missing here is ? "trot", "trotters"?]
gatairan - tar-mj-, tar-nj-, taura (mN), taurths (fI)
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/wWMplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
You are a member of the Gothic-L list. To unsubscribe, send a blank email to <gothic-l-unsubscribe at egroups.com>.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gothic-l/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
gothic-l-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the Gothic-l
mailing list