a Gothic poem (verse 3)--syntax, word usage

Le Bateman LeBateman at ATT.NET
Sun Aug 28 04:25:02 UTC 2005


Isn't that form guð instead of guþ? Grimm seemed to think it was. He said
the Goths dereived their name from guð. Which is the word for God.
Le
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roman Rausch" <aranwe at mail.ru>
To: <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 8:04 AM
Subject: [gothic-l] Re: a Gothic poem (verse 3)--syntax, word usage


>The genitive plural of 'guþ' "god" would be 'gude', a neuter a-stem,
>but takes masculine attributes in singular when applied to the
Christian
>god. Perhaps you were remembering *Gutane "of the Goths" (from the
>Pietroassa inscription <gutani>)?

Oh, an a-stem.. Probably I keep confusing the two because both are
_Got-_ in German..

>I take it you mean "quick" in the archaic English sense of "living" -
>- in which case, that's right.

Yes - archaic words favored in poetry, though this one will surely be
misunderstood, so 'a living spirit' should be sufficient.

Regarding _saiwala_:
Is it possible that the concept of an immortal soul was applied to
this word during the christianization? So the pagan Germanic tribes
didn't know such a thing; at the early stage of chrisitiniaztion it
was still used for a bit different things; but later, when the
Catholic church became predominant its meaning was further restricted.
Well, and my text isn't really Christian in content..

>Sentences in OE poetry can be very long and
>loose, with much paratactic incrementation, so I think what you've
>done is quite in keeping with that.

Well, except for the ending-rhymes instead of alliterantions. :-)

>du leitilamma mela raihtis bruks was ... iþ...
>In this last example, RAIHTIS seems to have strayed quite far into
>the sentence, but in fact I think this still counts as "second
position"

It has also ventured farther than usual in _ikei ana andaugi raihtis
hauns im in izwis_ 'who in presence am base among you' (Cor.II,10:1).
But with the usual second position the only way to keep it in the end
of the line seems to be a breaking up of the sentence over two lines..
And this is getting too complicated, mhm.. let's try something else:

Þaírh ita diwand mahteis,
Akei galiuhtjiþ nahtins

Or would _Jah sik galiuhtjand nahteis_ be also possible for the second
line?





You are a member of the Gothic-L list.  To unsubscribe, send a blank email
to <gothic-l-unsubscribe at egroups.com>.
Yahoo! Groups Links











------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/wWMplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

You are a member of the Gothic-L list.  To unsubscribe, send a blank email to <gothic-l-unsubscribe at egroups.com>. 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gothic-l/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    gothic-l-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



More information about the Gothic-l mailing list