Visborg on Gutland and the Visi-Goths
akoddsson
konrad_oddsson at YAHOO.COM
Mon Jul 10 19:36:12 UTC 2006
Hails Tore.
--- In gothic-l at yahoogroups.com, Tore Gannholm <tore at ...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Vi is holy place where the gods were worshipped.
>
> Tore
Indeed. However, the name is Visborg (contains -s-), not Viborg. The
Old Norse word vé is neuter, compounds with its root (vébjörg in
Denmark, for example) and occurs in Gutnish as wî/vî (as Gutnish
does not lower the ê to î, as in all other Scandic languages, and in
this respect matches Gothic). Gutnish wî would occur in the language
of Wulfila's time as *wîh (written *weih), but would be neuter in
contrast to the related weiha, masc. 'priest'(also occuring in Old
Norse as véi, Gutnish *wîi). Now, if the element in Visborg were
really *wîha, then we could generate a Gothic *weihabaurgs, but this
would yield Gutnish *wîborg/vîborg after syncope instead of attested
Visborg - thus, a more logical forerunner to Gutnish Wîsborg would
be Gothic *wîsiborgs (written aka Wulfila *weisibaurgs), which would
yield the correct form. Note that Gothic *weih would be an a-stem
neuter, compounding with the same -a- that originally occured in the
nominitive/accusitive singular (pre-Wulfilian-Gothic *wîha). I want
to add here as an aside that the personal name vîsburr also occurs
on a migration-era Swedish king (see Ynglingasaga), something which
I forgot to mention in my original post (meaning something like
famous/renowned son/offspring). If this is related, and I think it
likely, then the name would occur in Wulfilia Gothic as *weisibaur,
using the same element as *weisibaurgs (pronounced wîsiborgs), famed
son and famed city, respectively. Now, as to whether or not assumed
Gothic element *weis- really compounds with compositional -i- (as in
English 'visigoth' or not, or is even an oroiginal i-stem, I cannot
say at this time (lack of available evidence).
Regards,
Kunjareths
> On Jul 10, 2006, at 6:31 PM, akoddsson wrote:
>
> > Regarding the element 'visi-' in english 'visigoths', I am not
sure that there is a general scholarly consensus as to what its
actual form would be in Gothic. It is often thought to mean
something like 'famous/renowned'. I have never seen any references
to this element being used in germanic languages, personal- or place-
names in general. It seems isolated, and thus likely the questions
about what its Gothic form would have been, if it is indeed Gothic.
However, I noticed that it could be related to the name Visborg on
Gutland, which is mentioned in Gutasaga and in Gutland inscription
#100 (rundatabase). What struck me here is that the element occurs,
of all places, on Gutland ;) Now, as is known, Visborg is a major
historical location on Gutland. Now, it would certainly be
interesting if the so-called 'visi-goths' of later, continental fame
had this 'visi-' element due to an historical origin in or around
Visborg. Judging from the changes into the later Gutlandic, an
earlier form might have been something like *weisibaurgs in
Wulfila's spelling. Anyway, the fact that the only other possible
instance of the 'visi-' element that I could find was on Gutland,
and then for a major location, really struck me.
> > Regards,
> > Kunjareths.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
You are a member of the Gothic-L list. To unsubscribe, send a blank email to <gothic-l-unsubscribe at egroups.com>.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gothic-l/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
gothic-l-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the Gothic-l
mailing list