[gothic-l] Re: is Gothic the language of one or a few men?

[OSCAR HERRE duke.co@sbcglobal.net [gothic-l]]

???? 


On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 11:02 AM, "Dicentis a roellingua at gmail.com [gothic-l]" <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
  


  
Oscar, they were is better to say, except for the Spanish royal family there aren't really any people anymore with real Visigothic blood, like there are people with say, Swedish or Italian blood.

Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 heeft OSCAR HERRE duke.co at sbcglobal.net [gothic-l] <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> het volgende geschreven:
>  
>
> the lingo has been fluent throughout the gothic pilgrimages.....they are still and were a well polarized group of people....im sure some were bilingual in communicating mith other peoples and languages
>
> On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:40 AM, "edmundfairfax at yahoo.ca [gothic-l]" <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
>  
> Dear Roel,
> This is a rather antiquated view now. One sometimes comes across similar claims for German, such that Luther is seen as the "father" of Early Modern German. The idea is not so much that Gothic was spoken only by a few, but rather that the Bible translation "standardized" Gothic, that is, created a literary standard for Goths of varying dialects. Such a view is entirely speculative, however, since we do not know how much dialectal variation there was amongst Goths, or how great it was, or whether the language of the Bible translation was felt by Goths to be a novel creation. Always ask for proof.
> Audamunds
>
>   
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/gothic-l/attachments/20150211/a8189279/attachment.htm>