Re: [gothic-l] Re: is þar sind correct as they are?

[OSCAR HERRE duke.co@sbcglobal.net [gothic-l]]

roel????...your some moderator dude..... 


On Sunday, March 1, 2015 11:42 AM, "Dicentis a roellingua at gmail.com [gothic-l]" <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
  


  
I studied Braunes grammar and Wrights book and I read a lot in the Gothic bible, and you tell me to take lessons lol, where did you read that nonsense of sindamma.

Op zondag 1 maart 2015 heeft OSCAR HERRE duke.co at sbcglobal.net [gothic-l] <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> het volgende geschreven:
>  
>
> you should have taken lessons dude......
>
> On Sunday, March 1, 2015 11:31 AM, "Dicentis a roellingua at gmail.com [gothic-l]" <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
>  
> No, they are is "sind". Where in the bible or Skeireind is sindamma attested?
>
> Op zondag 1 maart 2015 heeft OSCAR HERRE duke.co at sbcglobal.net [gothic-l] <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> het volgende geschreven:
>>  
>>
>> they are dude......
>>
>> On Sunday, March 1, 2015 11:12 AM, "Dicentis a roellingua at gmail.com [gothic-l]" <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>  
>> Sindamma? What's that supposed to mean?
>>
>> Op zondag 1 maart 2015 heeft OSCAR HERRE duke.co at sbcglobal.net [gothic-l] <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> het volgende geschreven:
>>>  
>>>
>>> sindamma would be better....
>>>
>>> On Sunday, March 1, 2015 10:35 AM, "Dicentis a roellingua at gmail.com [gothic-l]" <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>> I always use "sind" or "ist", someone told me however that þar ist or þar sind can be used as meaning there is or there are too, like:
>>> There is a man which works.
>>>
>>> But where is this attested except for in modern Germanic languages, and isn't it better to use what the Bible uses?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>   
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/gothic-l/attachments/20150301/ed0fd1f1/attachment.htm>