[gothic-l] Re: is þar sind correct as they are?

[Dicentis a roellingua@gmail.com [gothic-l]]

You can reconstruct swifns too, Edmund used swifns for his translation of
the book Egbert wird rot into Gothic.

Op zondag 1 maart 2015 heeft Johann Dröge anheropl0x at gmail.com [gothic-l] <
gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> het volgende geschreven:
>
>
> It is somewhat odd that for the Gospels one can't find instances of
"there is/are". But there are several words (or rather ideas) that surpass
the bible in age and never make it in. Like dream for example.
>
> Through a couple methods we can assume the word for dream in Gothic is
draums, but it is never attested. The word dream just never shows up.
Surely people dreamed before Jesus walked the earth?:P
>
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Dicentis a roellingua at gmail.com
[gothic-l] <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Well, Gothic looks mostly like early languages as Latin and languages
close to Indo-European like Russian, so I guess tgat is and sind would have
sounded native. Also, if it wasn't, Wulfila and/or his scribes would have
translated it in a different wsy most likely.
>>
>> Op zondag 1 maart 2015 heeft Johann Dröge anheropl0x at gmail.com
[gothic-l] <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> het volgende geschreven:
>> >
>> >
>> > Whether or not it is taken from Greek, I can not say. But it makes
sense to me. Russian actually does kind of the same thing, but obviously
Russian is not close to Gothic... not unless you want to get into a large
debate lol.
>> >
>> > The Germanic languages that I know seem to all have their own way for
stating the existence of something. For example, German's "es gibt" is
quite different from English "there is/are"
>> >
>> > Es gibt = it gives
>> > Det finns = I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that it means something
like "it finds"? I don't speak Swedish yet. :c
>> > Það er = Much closer to English there is
>> >
>> > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Dicentis a roellingua at gmail.com
[gothic-l] <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Yes Johann, you confirm what I thought. An admin of the Gothic wiki
told me that thar ist for existence is fine, but I disagreed with him
because I can't find that in the Gothic Bible. But is it possible that
"ist" is taken over from the original Greek and there is for existence is
used in other early Germanic languages?
>> >>
>> >> Op zondag 1 maart 2015 heeft Johann Dröge anheropl0x at gmail.com
[gothic-l] <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> het volgende geschreven:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Oscar is a fucking idiot.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Back to the topic, not making up fake words and claiming others
should "take lessons"...
>> >> >
>> >> > I just use ïst or sind. Your example is a little bit difficult to
do directly, but I might write it as:
>> >> > Manna waurkjands/a ïst.
>> >> >
>> >> > But! If you are actually trying to point out his/her/their location
(There is a working man, as opposed to here is a working man) then þar or
jainar can be used. But in English, the phrase "there is/are" can be used
to simply state the existence of something, without referring to any actual
location.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Dicentis a roellingua at gmail.com
[gothic-l] <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I studied Braunes grammar and Wrights book and I read a lot in the
Gothic bible, and you tell me to take lessons lol, where did you read that
nonsense of sindamma.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Op zondag 1 maart 2015 heeft OSCAR HERRE duke.co at sbcglobal.net
[gothic-l] <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> het volgende geschreven:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > you should have taken lessons dude......
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Sunday, March 1, 2015 11:31 AM, "Dicentis a
roellingua at gmail.com [gothic-l]" <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > No, they are is "sind". Where in the bible or Skeireind is
sindamma attested?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Op zondag 1 maart 2015 heeft OSCAR HERRE duke.co at sbcglobal.net
[gothic-l] <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> het volgende geschreven:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> they are dude......
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Sunday, March 1, 2015 11:12 AM, "Dicentis a
roellingua at gmail.com [gothic-l]" <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Sindamma? What's that supposed to mean?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Op zondag 1 maart 2015 heeft OSCAR HERRE duke.co at sbcglobal.net
[gothic-l] <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> het volgende geschreven:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> sindamma would be better....
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> On Sunday, March 1, 2015 10:35 AM, "Dicentis a
roellingua at gmail.com [gothic-l]" <gothic-l at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> I always use "sind" or "ist", someone told me however that þar
ist or þar sind can be used as meaning there is or there are too, like:
>> >> >> >>> There is a man which works.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> But where is this attested except for in modern Germanic
languages, and isn't it better to use what the Bible uses?
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Glaðliga ríða Noregs męnn til Hildar þings.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Glaðliga ríða Noregs męnn til Hildar þings.
>> >
>> >
>
>
> --
> Glaðliga ríða Noregs męnn til Hildar þings.
>
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/gothic-l/attachments/20150301/0e204226/attachment.htm>