HPSG is not generative grammar
Carl Pollard
pollard at ling.ohio-state.edu
Sat Jan 1 07:58:31 UTC 2000
Hi Adam,
That's fascinating. I always thought any kind of mathematical
system that (inter alia) determined a set of strings or a set
of structural representations of some kind or other counted
as a generative grammar. I wonder whether Neil Smith's usage
had any mathematical conception behind it, or if he was just using
the term "generative grammar" as an informal synonym for
Chomsky-style linguistically oriented activity.
Carl
>
In case you ever wondered whether the term `generative grammar' encompasses
HPSG or not, there is now a definite answer to this question:
"For alternatives to generative grammar, see inter alia Borsley, 1996;
Pollard & Sag, 1994; Steedman, 1993; Bresnan, 1994; Hudson, 1990."
This is a quote from: Neil Smith (1999), "Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals",
p.223, Cambridge University Press.
Happy New Year, to generative and non-generative grammarians alike,
Adam P.
--
,
ADAM PRZEPIORKOWSKI
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Ohio State University | work: (USA) (614) 292 5389
Department of Linguistics | home: (USA) (614) 261 1572
222 Oxley Hall | fax: (USA) (614) 292 8833
1712 Neil Ave. |
Columbus OH 43210 | email: adamp at ling.ohio-state.edu
--------------------------------------------------------------
URL: http://www.ipipan.waw.pl/mmgroup/ap.html
--------------------------------------------------------------
On leave from the Institute of Computer Science,
Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw.
>>
More information about the HPSG-L
mailing list