differences between SBCG and ECxG

[Valia Kordoni]

has this been computationally implemented, or is it to be understood  
as theoretical analysis so far?

Regards,

Valia

Am 21.07.2011 um 21:25 schrieb Stefan Müller:

>> Embodied CxG differs from SB-CxG with regard to locality assumptions.
>> ECxG does not have a MOTHERS feature and hence is more similar to old
>> school HPSG. Richter and Sailer argued in 2009 that the locality
>> assumptions of SB-CxG are too strong to account for certain idioms  
>> and
>> hence the current state of the art seems to be something equivalent  
>> to
>> PS94.
>
> Referring to Sag 1997 rather than PS94 would have been more  
> appropriate
> in the above paragraph. There was a change in the treatment of  
> daughters
> and phrases from PS94 to Sag, 1997, which is important.
>
> Sorry for this mistake.
>
> Best wishes
>
> 	Stefan
>
> -- 
> Stefan Müller       Tel: (+49) (+30) 838 52973
>                    Fax: (+49) (030) 838 4 52973
> Institut für Deutsche und Niederländische Philologie
> Deutsche Grammatik
> Habelschwerdter Allee 45
> 14 195 Berlin
>
> http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/
>
> http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/Babel/Interaktiv/
>
>
>

--
PD Dr. Valia Kordoni,
Senior Researcher
DFKI GmbH
Language Technology
Alt Moabit 91c
D-10559 Berlin
Germany
Tel  (New): ++49 30/238 95-1820
Fax (New): ++49 30/238 95-1810
email: kordoni at dfki.de

-------------------------------------------------------------
Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH
Firmensitz: Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern

Geschaeftsfuehrung:
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
Dr. Walter Olthoff

Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes

Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
-------------------------------------------------------------