[HPSG-L] extraction of primary objects and benefactives in English
Stefan Müller
St.Mueller at hu-berlin.de
Mon Nov 28 20:19:19 UTC 2016
Hi everybody,
I am looking at extractions of objects in English. The literature claims
that extraction of the primary object is out/bad/marked and the
extraction of the secondary object is fine.
Hudson:
We give children sweets.
Which sweets do you give children _?
% Which children do you give _ sweets?
First question: Are there any experimental studies on this?
Second question: Are benefactive different?
He carved this woman a statue.
What kind of statue did he carve this woman _?
% Which woman did he carve _ a statue?
Third question: Is there an HPSG analysis that formally blocks the
extraction of one of the objects?
I would do this by lexically specifying the SLASH value of the object as
empty, but maybe there is a paper on or an implementation of this already.
Thanks!
Greetings from Berlin
Stefan
@article{Hudson92a,
Author = {Richard Hudson},
Journal = {Language},
Number = {2},
Pages = {251--276},
Title = {So-Called 'Double Objects' and Grammatical Relations},
Volume = {68},
Year = {1992}}
More information about the HPSG-L
mailing list