Mia's poster session

[Akira Y. Yamamoto]

The way the proposal was presented may have been the reason for not 
included in the SSILA Sessions. You may want to post the abstract and 
get feedback on it from the friends here.  AY

At 1:46 PM -0500 12/15/06, MJ Hardman wrote:
>I would  like to ask any of you that go to the LSA to give us 
>feedback.  As it  turned out, my young colleague$B+c(Bs paper to SSILA on 
>our project was rejected so  she will not be there.  (I was quite 
>[something] by the rejection since I  was the one who had encouraged 
>her; I had wanted her to meet you-all and to  see what else was 
>being done.  Oh, well.)  What we have done, I  believe uniquely (and 
>would want to know if it is otherwise) is to provide, at  the click 
>of a button, a full grammatical analysis of everything, including 
>individual morpheme identification, base form of the morpheme and 
>morphological conditioning rules, as well as concordance of all uses 
>of the  morpheme in the database.  Any feedback would be so very 
>welcome by any  of you who see our movie at Mia$B+c(Bs digital poster 
>session.
>
>MJ


-- 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/ilat/attachments/20061215/629ff063/attachment.htm>