re SIL

[Richard Smith]

kweh Richard LaFortune,

I sure agree with alot of what you share here.
Some people can't seem to see it.
The Evangelical/Catholic Christian views things through a window
which insists on some major absolutes usually very different than the
paradigms of the people groups they go to "save".

Giving benefit of the doubt that most are basicly wholesome people,
an Evangelical is not necessarily and consciously intent on destroying a
culture. In fact culture and even language is a side issue completely.
He might actually love those who he views as "ignorant of God" and care
deeply in his heart for souls he understands as condemned to eternal
damnation.
>From his paradigm window, these natives are children of "the fall" of
a literal Adam and Eve, and they need to be rescued at any cost.
I think Its important for us to understand what compels missionary work,
even if their view of reality is MAJOR different than our own.

An example with own ancestors i've used before: Jesuit priests would
secretly baptize Wendat children dying of small pox when their parents
weren't looking.When they were caught doing it, parents were horrified and
threw the priests out of the longhouses in fear that priests were now
finishing their children off with witchcraft and mumbling strange curses.
Its possible BOTH parents and priests deeply cared for the dying ones,
but these priests were strange newcomers, and were acting out of line.
Even if they wrote happily in their journals about how they saved dying
children from hell that day...    to my own people they acted wrongly.

Language is their vehicle for conversion of people to their own paradigm.
Wycliffe wants to "reduce" all earths languages to writing so that people
can read the Christian Bible in their own language. Its inherent with many
Christian beliefs that when "all have heard"   Christ will return to earth.
All this passion of foreigners coming to save souls from "sin" and hellfire
and convert the lost to a middle-eastern based paradigm has a cost
and weakens alot of  very important traditions of our people
but strangely enough it has one bright side. Languages are preserved and
even some pretty complicated thought is recorded.

I guess maybe i'm trying to be positive,

Richard Zane Smith
Wyandotte Oklahoma 



On 5/5/08 11:06 AM, "Richard LaFortune" <anguksuar at YAHOO.COM> wrote:

> I forwarded this earlier to Rudy and rec'd a response.
>  Some people would assert that some evangelical
> translations efforts have advanced applied
> -not theoretical- linguistics...except First Speakers
> are required for applied fieldwork and other tasks of
> science.  And the early and emerging information about
> these outfits over the past couple of decades
> convincingly alleges that these reactionary
> denominational translators were all about neutalizing
> (and you can interpret that word in its most sobering
> sense) the very people who were first speakers,
> because of fights over natural and political
> resources.  There is no valid argument for any
> government surveillance that wipes out a quarter
> million Native first speakers; there is no balance in
> which a list of languages outweighs the lives of
> sovereign people in our ancestral domains by force of
> violence.  My own family are leading heirarchy in one
> of the minority evangelical denominations in North
> America, so I know from missions; and I'm a Native
> person whose lineage is straght-up medicine people as
> well.  I was raised not to express an opinion unless
> it was considered and useful in some way.  But
> that's...
> 
> Just an opinion
> Anguksuar (Richard LaFortune)
> 
> 
>> A lot of people in the field disagree with you Rudy-
>> with all due respect- folks from the aeryies of the
>> Academy, to the corn fields and jungles where SIL
> and
>> New Tribes Mission have operated over the decades.
>> This includes people who have spoken to me
> anecdotally
>> and have no particular political axes to grind.
>> 
>> I suggest interested people on ILAT take a look at
>> "Thy Will Be Done:  The Conquest of the Amazon :
>> Nelson Rockefeller and Evangelism in the Age of Oi";
>> and "The Missionaries", by Norman Lewis.  To use the
>> phrase 'without substantiation' suggests that a
> great
>> deal of scholarship and actual substantiation from
>> international government agencies, to personal
>> communications by people of regard.  Who cares if
> they
>> have done important things in linguistics - Hitler
>> built nice highways.
>> Richard
> 
> 
> 
>       
> ______________________________________________________________________________
> ______
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ