SV: Pre-Greek languages
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv at wxs.nl
Sat Dec 11 13:55:09 UTC 1999
Lars Martin Fosse <lmfosse at online.no> wrote:
>Eduard Selleslagh [SMTP:edsel at glo.be] skrev 19. oktober 1999 08:52:
>> [Ed Selleslagh]
>> 3. The presence of Elamite (in Antiquity) and Brahwi (Dravidian) in Iran
>> strongly suggests that the Dravidian territory stretched far more westward
>> than at present. It seems - but I have no documentation at hand - that the
>> old Indus valley culture is now recognized as having been Dravidian, which
>> reinforces the hypothesis.
>The presence of Brahui has been shown to be due to a migration of Dravidian
>speakers from the South of India (probably mercenaries) a few hundred years
>ago. They are therefore not relevant for the discussion of the earliest
>period.
>From the South of India? I'm aware of theories that derive
Brahui from a migration from medieval Northern India (although I
don't know what the arguments for it are), but Southern India
would seem to be very strange: isn't it agreed that Brahui is
closest to the North-East Dravidian languages Kurux and Malto?
=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv at wxs.nl
More information about the Indo-european
mailing list