Patrick C. Ryan
proto-language at email.msn.com
Thu Feb 4 14:49:44 UTC 1999
Dear Rich and IEists:
From: Patrick C. Ryan <proto-language at email.msn.com>
Date: Thursday, February 04, 1999 4:11 AM
[ moderator snip ]
>[ Moderator's comment:
> But this violates Bartholomae's Law: The Sanskrit evidence shows us -kt-,
> which could not arise from PIE *-ght- (which gives Sanskrit -gdh-).
> --rma ]
Good point *if* the compound had been formed independently in each branch
*after* the Indo-Iranians were separated.
I am under the impression that though Kurylowicz and others have been
interested in extending the "law" back to PIE times, this has not met
general acceptance but perhaps I am not privy to the latest information.
If *ne(u)k(h)-to- had already become compounded in PIE, Bartholomae's Law
would not have come into play, would it?
More information about the Indo-european