Personal Pronouns / Ergativity
Patrick C. Ryan
proto-language at email.msn.com
Thu Jun 3 06:02:52 UTC 1999
Dear Peter and IEists:
----- Original Message -----
From: petegray <petegray at btinternet.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 1999 3:04 PM
Peter wrote:
> It is precisely the use of an objective form for the subject-topic of a
> stative sentence which leads some people to argue that there are hints of
> an earlier ergative stage here.
> Have I missed something in your argument?
Pat comments:
Perhaps I have missed something also. In what IE language does an objective
form function as the subject-topic of a stative sentence?
[ Moderator's comment:
The reference is, I believe, to o-stem neuter nominative/accusative which
looks like o-stem non-neuter accusative. However, in other stem formations,
the parallel in appearance does not exist.
--rma ]
Pat
PATRICK C. RYAN (501) 227-9947; FAX/DATA (501)312-9947 9115 W. 34th St.
Little Rock, AR 72204-4441 USA WEBPAGES:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/2803 and PROTO-RELIGION:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/2803/proto-religion/indexR.html "Veit
ek, at ek hekk, vindga meipi, nftr allar nmu, geiri undapr . . . a ~eim
meipi er mangi veit hvers hann af rstum renn." (Havamal 138)
More information about the Indo-european
mailing list