minimal pairs
Ross Clark (FOA LING)
r.clark at auckland.ac.nz
Fri Dec 15 03:29:27 UTC 2000
-----Original Message-----
From: larryt at cogs.susx.ac.uk [mailto:larryt at cogs.susx.ac.uk]
To: Indo-European at xkl.com
Robert Whiting writes:
> Now there are those who say that they have no rules for the
> pronunciation of <th>. Presumably, when they encounter in print
> an unfamiliar word with <th> in it they have to go to the
> dictionary to find out how to pronounce it. I happen to have
> generalized rules for the pronunciation of <th> so I can usually
> make a guess that will be right about 98 times out of 100 about
> how <th> should be pronounced in an unfamiliar word. I came
> across one the other day: 'poikilothermic'. Without going to
> the dictionary I knew two things just by looking at it: a) it is
> not a native English word, and therefore, b) the <th> is
> pronounced [T].
>This is usually a good rule, but there are a few exceptions. I can
>think of 'rhythm', 'logarithm' and 'algorithm', and their derivatives,
>all of which have eth in spite of their Greek origin. There must be a
>subrule here, though 'arithmetic' has theta.
Compare "arrhythmia" for a near-minimal contrast.
Ross Clark
More information about the Indo-european
mailing list