the Wheel and Dating PIE
Larry Trask
larryt at cogs.susx.ac.uk
Sun Feb 6 15:07:45 UTC 2000
Ed Selleslagh writes:
> After reading Ante Aikio's contributions, I suspect Uralic might begin
> to shed 'some' light on this matter. On the Basque side we have the
> intriguing matter of a number of suffixes that also pop up in IE
> (e.g.-z-ko <> -(s)ko in Slavic, basically with the 'same' meaning and
> use).
A suffix *<-ko> is commonly posited for PIE, and this developed an
extended form *<-s-ko> in some branches, notably Germanic. Basque
has a very common suffix <-ko>, and a compound suffix <-z-ko> (phonetic
[-sko]).
Many years ago, the late Antonio Tovar published a series of articles
arguing that the PIE and Basque suffixes were so similar in their behavior
that they must derive from a common source, which he took to be some
(rather murky) kind of ancient contact.
I have criticized this idea rather severely in various places. The
problem is that the Basque suffix does not really behave very much like
the PIE one.
The PIE suffix was a word-forming suffix. It derived chiefly adjectives
but also nouns. I have never seen any suggestion that it ever had
a syntactic function.
The Basque suffix, in great contrast, is primarily a syntactic suffix:
it can be added to just about any adverbial constituent, regardless of
internal structure, to produce a preposed adjectival modifier. That
'preposed' is significant, since lexical adjectives in Basque are
postposed.
Basque <-ko> also has two other functions, marginal by comparison.
It can derive a preposed adjectival from an N-bar satisfying certain
partly obscure conditions. And it can derive nouns from nouns.
Now, the Basque suffix does not derive adjectives -- the chief function
of the PIE *<-ko>. It does derive nouns, but only marginally. It is
overwhelmingly a syntactic morpheme, while the PIE suffix is not.
This doesn't look to me like a good case for proposing a common origin.
Finally, Basque <-z-ko> is transparently only the instrumental suffix
<-z> -- which is adverbial in function -- plus <-ko>. It cannot possibly
be identified with the *<-s-ko> found in IE.
Larry Trask
COGS
University of Sussex
Brighton BN1 9QH
UK
larryt at cogs.susx.ac.uk
More information about the Indo-european
mailing list