GREEK PREHISTORY AND IE (EVIDENCE?)
Stanley Friesen
sarima at friesen.net
Thu Feb 10 15:36:40 UTC 2000
At 12:42 AM 2/5/00 -0500, X99Lynx at aol.com wrote:
>Yes. SORRY. But yes. Not 'the introduction of agriculture as such' - The
>term 'middle neolithic' as applied to Europe as a whole (not locally)
>encompasses my 4500-4000BC date. For some reason you are calling the whole
>process 'early neolithic'. Neolithic is basically a distinction from
>mesolithic. Early neolithic in Europe as a whole generally denotes the
>period before 5000BC. Locally the term is sometimes used when different
>sub-periods can be identified. But in terms of Europe, farming 'as such' is
>also being introduced in the late neolithic and in some areas even in the
>'European iron age.'
This is a different use of the terms than I am familiar with. I guess I
have not often come across their use for "Europe as a whole".
But this still doesn't change the basic facts: the agricultural revolution
is too old, and took too long to spread over Europe, for it to be
associated with PIE. Whether one uses local terminology or pan-European
terminology does not change this fact.
--------------
May the peace of God be with you. sarima at ix.netcom.com
More information about the Indo-european
mailing list