IE "Urheimat" and evidence from Uralic linguistics
JoatSimeon at aol.com
JoatSimeon at aol.com
Tue Feb 8 22:54:46 UTC 2000
>petegray at btinternet.com writes:
>Interestingly, these _failed_ to prove convincingly that Hittite was IE!
>It was the rather obscure -r/-n heteroclite declension that was the final
>clincher for some people.
-- the first indication that Hittite was IE was a lexical term -- the word
for "water", specifically. ("watar")
If you look through a basic vocabulary list, say:
PIE Hittite English
*uet wett year
*doru taru tree
*iugom yukan yoke
*neuo newas new
*ueuok wewakk demand
*uedor witar waters
*esti es be
*genu genu knee
-- you get, to put it mildly, a very strong indication.
More information about the Indo-european
mailing list