Augment (was Re: German ge- ptcpl cognates?)
Ross Clark
r.clark at auckland.ac.nz
Fri Feb 11 02:33:35 UTC 2000
It is also a feature of Bickerton's prototypical Creole verb system: an
unmarked non-stative verb is interpreted as past; to make a present you add
the non-punctual aspect marker. Of course the extent to which this is realized
in actual languages remains debatable.
Ross Clark
>>> "petegray" <petegray at btinternet.com> 02/06 12:04 AM >>>
>. According to Bybee et
> >al (The evolution of grammar), unmarked past vs marked present is
> >unknown in extant languages.
This must surely be wrong - or at least disputable! Classical Hebrew has
an unmarked tense-form whose natural and commonest tense meaning is the
past. I believe Arabic, both classical and modern, has a similar
structure.
Peter
More information about the Indo-european
mailing list