Horses
Rick Mc Callister
rmccalli at sunmuw1.MUW.Edu
Tue Jan 18 05:36:56 UTC 2000
The word presumibly could have applied to other equids.
I don't know if wild asses were present in Anatolia at that time
but they were present in nearby Mesopotamia and Iran.
The weakness, of course, is that words derived from *ekwos almost
invariably apply to the horse.
>A few months ago, I made a post to the list in which I stated that the PIE
>word *ekwos "horse" is not probative in the question of the PIE homeland,
>since one need not have domesticated the horse to have a word for it.
>
>I want to retract that post. Beekes (1995) reports that horses (wild or
>domesticated) were not found in Anatolia in the period which Renfrew
>claims for the final IE unity, and Ringe (personal communication) has
>corroborated this claim. This is an important incongruity between the
>firmly reconstructed IE vocabulary and the homeland which Renfrew posits;
>it is a strong argument against Renfrew.
Rick Mc Callister
W-1634
Mississippi University for Women
Columbus MS 39701
More information about the Indo-european
mailing list