Munda in Early NW India
petegray at btinternet.com
Sun Apr 15 18:59:45 UTC 2001
> is there any convincing scenario for how the
> retroflex series became phonemic in Sanksrit from internal causes alone?
The distribution of the retroflex series is severely limited in the older
(a) after a lost vocalic /r/ (which can often be established from IE
(b) rarely before a lost /r/
(c) practically never initially
(d) after retroflex /s/, or as a substitute for it or other stops in certain
situations. (The aspirate retrofelx t.h occurs almost only here in the
(e) in loan words
The source appears to be a retroflexion after /r/, assisted by the presence
of retroflex articulations in loan words. I am sure this is disputable, but
it does not seem on the face of it unlikely.
More information about the Indo-european