Genetic Descent
Larry Trask
larryt at cogs.susx.ac.uk
Tue Jun 5 09:42:57 UTC 2001
--On Friday, June 1, 2001 12:26 pm -0500 "David L. White"
<dlwhite at texas.net> wrote:
> LT: If so, let me ask this: in what respect does Michif fall
> short of being a mixed language? It looks to me like a paradigm case of a
> mixed language. If we encountered, or imagined, a real mixed language,
> what features would it have that Michif lacks?
> DLW: The finite verbal morphology of Michif is all Cree. Therefore, by
> the Davidian standard, it is Cree. That also answers the scond question.
OK. My friend Homer is a specialist in nouns. He loves nouns, and he
regards them as paramount in languages. According to Homer, the ancestry
of a language is determined by the origin of its nouns. Therefore, by the
Homeric definition, Michif is French. End of discussion. ;-)
Why is Homer's position more arbitrary than yours?
Larry Trask
COGS
University of Sussex
Brighton BN1 9QH
UK
larryt at cogs.susx.ac.uk
Tel: (01273)-678693 (from UK); +44-1273-678693 (from abroad)
Fax: (01273)-671320 (from UK); +44-1273-671320 (from abroad)
More information about the Indo-european
mailing list