Return of the minimal pairs
Larry Trask
larryt at cogs.susx.ac.uk
Fri Jun 15 13:19:42 UTC 2001
--On Saturday, June 9, 2001 10:59 am -0400 "Douglas G. Wilson"
<douglas at nb.net> wrote:
[LT]
>> In my vernacular, even in proper names, I absolutely can't have /h/
>> before schwa or before unstressed /I/.
> Does Larry Trask really mean that he (in his American persona) doesn't say
> "habitual" with /h@/ (@ = schwa)? I think most Americans say it so, and my
> talking (Yankee) dictionary does.
OK; ya got me. I was being careless. I can certainly have /h/
word-initially, even before schwa, and I do have /h/ in 'habituate'. A
stupid blunder, and I can only blame the annual ordeal of exam-marking for
wiping out some of my favorite brain cells.
> Similarly: "habiliment", "rehabilitate",
> etc., etc., and one frequent pronunciation of "harass".
I definitely do not have /h/ in 'rehabilitate'. As for 'harass', I put the
stress on the first syllable. The word rhymes with 'embarrass', and also
with 'Paris'.
> Finding the /h/ between TWO schwas is a little more difficult ... some
> pronounce "Abraham" /eibr at h@m/,
Not me.
> and I wouldn't have trouble reading the
> imaginary but conceivable "ultra-habituating" as /Vltr at h@bItSueitIN/
Yes; if I encountered this, I would use /h/.
> or so
> ... I think "intrahabenular" = "inside the habenula" is an acceptable word
> (medical/anatomical) which would be pronounced /Intr at h@bEnjul at r/ usually
Probably, but not a word known to me.
OK. I'll try again. I cannot have /h/ before unstressed schwa except
word-initially ('Havana') or (sometimes) after an obvious prefix. I hope
I've got it right this time.
Thanks, Doug.
Larry Trask
COGS
University of Sussex
Brighton BN1 9QH
UK
larryt at cogs.susx.ac.uk
Tel: (01273)-678693 (from UK); +44-1273-678693 (from abroad)
Fax: (01273)-671320 (from UK); +44-1273-671320 (from abroad)
More information about the Indo-european
mailing list