SV: No Proto-Celtic?
Lars Martin Fosse
lmfosse at online.no
Thu May 10 09:14:02 UTC 2001
David L. White [SMTP:dlwhite at texas.net] skrev 6. mai 2001 16:21:
> There is good evidence of something like Semitic influence,
> sub-stratal or not, in Insular Celtic, and I suspected when I first read Dr.
> Trask's initial posting that something like this woud lie behind the views
> of the "No-Proto-Celtic" crowd. The typological lurch of Insular Celtic
> toward Semitic, illusory (in terms of actual Semites) or not, does indeed
> make it difficult to construct a unified proto-language. Difficult, but not
> impossible. Such questions as how and when Insular Celtic wound up
> verb-initial and so on just have to be answered at some point. They do no
> make proto-Celtic unviable, or suggest any such scenario as just given
> above.
As far as I know, Old Norse is also verb-initial. Should we assume Semitic
influence there too?
Would it be possible to get a list of features that point in the direction of
Semitic?
Best regards,
Lars Martin Fosse
Dr. art. Lars Martin Fosse
Haugerudvn. 76, Leil. 114,
0674 Oslo
Norway
Phone: +47 22 32 12 19
Mobile phone: +47 90 91 91 45
Fax 1: +47 22 32 12 19
Fax 2: +47 85 02 12 50 (InFax)
Email: lmfosse at online.no
More information about the Indo-european
mailing list