Your Baby Can Read....Research?

[Susana Lopez Ornat]

Chris, I loved your sensible message

Dra.Susana López Ornat

Dpto. Psicología Básica II
Facultad de Psicología
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Madrid 28223



----- Original Message ----- 
From: <wing0050 at umn.edu>
To: <info-childes at googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 12:21 AM
Subject: Re: Your Baby Can Read....Research?


Hi, Liz:

I am guessing that you are the wonderful type of parent who will provide a
stimulating environment for your child in a myriad of ways, and so my sense
is that whether you include early reading in this stimulating environment
or not, your child will do well. I have been asked this and similar
questions (re electronic programs, Baby Einstein, signing, early reading,
etc.) by a significant number of parents, and my response is generally that
given the gestalt of supportive and stimulating parenting that will occur
under your tutelage, you child will do well with or without early reading.
However, having said that, my own bias is that there is not much to be
gained by this pursuit. Generally, research on preschool readers indicates
that they tend to join a well-educated cohort at the same reading level by
grade 3. My own bias, having reviewed the sensorimotor literature and
worked with a good number of sensorimotor therapists over the course of my
career as an SLP, is to prioritize for young children hands-on and
multi-sensory experiences, accompanied by the appropriate oral language, as
the best foundation for future learning. (I also read that one of the
causative factors in our immune deficiency-prone society is our lack of
exposure to good old dirt and other nasty substances at an early age.)
While I emphasize pre-literacy and literacy skills to my low SES (and
wonderful) cohort of prschool children and parents, my advice to
well-educated and middle income and beyond cohorts is to sit back, talk to
your child, and get dirty.
Chris Wing,
Doctoral Candidate
Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences
University of Minnesota
United States of America


On Feb 28 2010, Aliyah MORGENSTERN wrote:

>Dear Liz,
>I don't know the program, so I can't judge but I'm a bit amazed. We  want 
>babies to baby-sign at 9 months (which isn't acquiring sign  language in a 
>signing environment) and now to read at 16 months...  Maybe it is important 
>that children be kept in a non literate world  for a few years and use 
>their ears (when they can) before entering  language through reading 
>skills. Reading is extremely important, but  literacy does change our 
>perspective on language and I'm personally  glad we all spend a few years 
>developing our oral language, our  gestures, ou prosody, and all that comes 
>with the vocal modality. I do  think that literacy changes our whole 
>perspective onclangauge. We gain  a new world, we lose what cultures 
>without a writing system did  maintain. But I'm not a specialist in that 
>field. It seems to me that  reading too soon could get them focussed on 
>different skills and they  might not use their natural capacities and the 
>specific cognitive and  mostly interactional or social skills as much. But 
>I might be wrong,  we all code-switch between two languages, some of us 
>from birth, maybe  that is just the same. It might just bring more to them 
>and be an  enrichment. I was glad my kids learned to play music at four 
>where  some of my friends found that it was totally crazy...
>If you decide to go ahead, let me know what you think of it.
>
>Best,
>Aliyah MORGENSTERN
>
>Professeur de linguistique
>Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3
>Institut du Monde Anglophone
>5 rue de l'Ecole de Médecine
>75006 Paris
>
>
>
>
>Le 28 févr. 10 à 22:53, Liz P. a écrit :
>
>> Hello Everybody,
>> I have a 16 month old baby girl, and i just recently acquired the Your
>> Baby Can Read Program, but when i started watching it, it seems too
>> good to be true, and i was asking my Language Acquisition professor
>> and she suggested that i inquire within to see if anyone knows the
>> research behind this program and if there are any down falls or
>> reasons why i shouldnt continue with the program with my daughter. I
>> can see the Pros (shell learn to read and expand her vocabulary) but
>> what would the Cons be. Thank you so much for your time. Any comments
>> will be appreciated
>>
>> Liz Pattison
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups "Info-CHILDES" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to info-childes at googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> info-childes+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/info-childes?hl=en
>> .
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Info-CHILDES" group.
To post to this group, send email to info-childes at googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
info-childes+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/info-childes?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Info-CHILDES" group.
To post to this group, send email to info-childes at googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to info-childes+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/info-childes?hl=en.