Standardized scores for IPSyn?
Brian MacWhinney
macw at cmu.edu
Fri Jun 3 17:59:07 UTC 2011
Bruno,
Scarborough's original paper was based on samples from 48 children. Some of her tables are based on a longitudinal sample of 15 children. She reports correlations with age and MLU and also shows that IPSyn scores for language-delayed children are higher than for controls. However, there was never, as far as I know, an attempt to standardize the test. In part, this may be because many of the items on the test involve a series of fairly tricky decisions and exclusions. Now that we have developed an automated version of IPSyn, it seems to me that it would be a good first step to run it across data in CHILDES to see whether changes in some of these tricky scoring rules make a difference and also to consider whether adding additional features or items could improve correlations with age or other scores. We are working on a method for doing this semi-automatically. Personally, I would find this more valuable than an attempt to standardize. But maybe others would disagree. By the way, there is a literature of about 30 articles that use the IPSyn and those may have additional clues.
-- Brian MacWhinney
On Jun 3, 2011, at 5:20 PM, Bruno Estigarribia wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> As far as I know, Hollis Scarborough's Index of Productive Syntax was never standardized, so only raw scores are available for statistical analysis. Is that correct?
> Thanks!
>
> Bruno
>
> Bruno Estigarribia
> Assistant Professor of Romance Languages and Literatures, Spanish Program
> Research Assistant Professor of Psychology, Cognitive Science Program
> Investigator, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities
> University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
> estigarr at email.unc.edu
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Info-CHILDES" group.
> To post to this group, send email to info-childes at googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to info-childes+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/info-childes?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Info-CHILDES" group.
To post to this group, send email to info-childes at googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to info-childes+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/info-childes?hl=en.
More information about the Info-childes
mailing list