[language] First human ancestors out of Africa?

H. Mark Hubey HubeyH at Mail.Montclair.edu
Thu May 11 19:58:35 UTC 2000


<><><><><><><><><><><><>--This is the Language List--<><><><><><><><><><><><><>





FOR RELEASE: 11 MAY 2000 AT 14:00 ET US
American Association for the Advancement of Science
http://www.aaas.org/

New fossils may be first human ancestors out of Africa, say Science authors

Washington, D.C-- A nearly complete fossil cranium and another skullcap,
representing the earliest known human ancestors from Eurasia, may also belong
to the first hominid species to journey out of Africa. A team of Georgian,
German, French and U.S. researchers describe these "First Eurasians" from the
site of Dmanisi in the Republic of Georgia in the 12 May issue of Science.

The Science authors say that these 1.7 million year-old fossils are the first
fossils discovered outside of Africa to show clear signs of African ancestry.
The age and skeletal characteristics of the Dmanisi skulls link them to the
early human species Homo ergaster, a species that some researchers believe is
the African version of Homo erectus.

Most scientists think that Homo erectus was the first hominid species to leave
the African continent, although the exact identity of these ancestral travelers
and the timing of their departure has been hotly debated for decades. Under the
classic scenario, Homo erectus, armed with an advanced tool kit called the
Acheulean or hand-ax tradition, became the first human species capable of
braving an array of challenging environments outside the African cradle.

The Dmanisi fossils, however, may undermine this tale of the technologically
triumphant hominid. Stone tools found with the two skulls are of the less
sophisticated "pebble-chopper" type that preceded the Acheulean in Africa, and
the site itself is older than any known Acheulean tools. The tools, along with
details of the fossils' anatomy and the age of the site, "argue for early,
pre-Acheulean migrations out of Africa," say the authors.

The fossils were retrieved during the course of archaeological investigations
of a medieval castle at Dmanisi. Meticulous geological investigation confirms
that the human fossils, accompanying animal bones, and tools come from
sediment-filled, irregularly-shaped "burrows," scooped out of the ancient
strata by the flow of groundwater, according to co-author Reid Ferring of the
University of North Texas.

The two skulls were collected from the same layer and excavation pit as a
hominid jawbone that was found at the site in 1991 and whose species identity
was debated. "It was a very nice surprise to find these skulls," says co-author
David Lordkipanidze of the Republic of Georgia State Museum, who notes that the
well-preserved crania provided enough diagnostic detail for the researchers to
compare them with other fossil human species. Their analysis showed that the
Dmanisi fossils shared extensive similarities with the African species Homo
ergaster from the well-known site of Koobi Fora in Kenya.

The research team discovered that the Dmanisi and Koobi Fora fossils overlap in
age as well. Dmanisi contains a jackpot of chronological clues, from the
isotope dates on the layer of basalt rock running beneath the site, to the
paleomagnetic signature and contemporaneous animal fossils in overlying
deposits.

Isotope analysis of the basalt places the age of the site at around 1.77
million years old, but the paleomagnetic signature of the sediment burrows
themselves encompasses a period from 1.77 million to a little over a million
years ago. Since the European faunal record is already well dated, the
associated animal fossils at Dmanisi became "essential for understanding the
timing of the site. Small rodents known to have lived more than 1.7 million
years ago occur with the hominids," says co-author Carl C. Swisher III of the
Berkeley Geochronology Center. In this case, the faunal evidence tipped the
scales in favor of an earlier date.

More than 1000 stone artifacts have been recovered from the Dmanisi fossil
layers, providing further support to the 1.7 million year-old date for the
site. Despite the ready availability of raw material suitable for making
Acheulean tools, the authors say, all of the Dmanisi artifacts are of a
pre-Acheulean type that appeared in Africa as early as 2.4 million years ago.

If superior technology didn't lead the way out of Africa, as the Dmanisi
evidence suggests, what other factors may have prompted these early humans to
leave the continent? The Science authors speculate that the move might have
been appetite-driven. "Basically the argument that we're making is that during
that time in Africa, the savanna is expanding and there is a greater
availability of 'protein on the hoof'," explains co-author Susan Antón of the
University of Florida in Gainesville. "With the appearance of Homo , we see
bigger bodies that require more energy to run, and therefore need these higher
quality sources of protein as fuel." Antón notes that as early humans shifted
their diets to include larger amounts of animal protein, there probably was a
corresponding expansion in their home range to match the ranges of these
animals.

Along with Ferring, Lordkipanidze, Swisher, and Antón, the Dmanisi research
group includes Director Leo Gabunia and Abesalom Vekua of the Republic of
Georgia National Academy of Sciences, Antje Justus, Gerhard Bosinski, and Olaf
Jöris of the Romisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum, Merab Tvalchrelidze, Givi
Majsuradze, Aleksander Mouskhelishvili, and Media Nioradze of the Republic of
Georgia State Museum, and Marie-A. de Lumley of the Laboratoire Muséum National
d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS.

---<><><><><><><><><><><><>----Language----<><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Copyrights/"Fair Use":  http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html
The "fair use" exemption to copyright law was created to allow things
such as commentary, parody, news reporting, research and education
about copyrighted works without the permission of the author. That's
important so that copyright law doesn't block your freedom to express
your own works -- only the ability to express other people's.
Intent, and damage to the commercial value of the work are
important considerations.

You are currently subscribed to language as: language at listserv.linguistlist.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-language-4283Y at csam-lists.montclair.edu



More information about the Language mailing list