[Lexicog] "like"
Chaz and Helga Mortensen
chaz_mortensen at SIL.ORG
Tue Sep 6 12:22:17 UTC 2005
I'm like,
"There's like another language with a phenomenon like this besides
English?! Hello?!!
-Chaz
En serio: I first heard this when seeing an old James Dean movie from
the late 50s.
On Sep 6, 2005, at 6:17 AM, Fritz Goerling wrote:
> Howdy, Rudy,
>
> This adolescents' use of "like" is like German adolescents' use of
> "irgendwie" (= somehow).
> It is not just a "crutch for lexical indecision" (Diamond, Siegel, see
> below) but also a sign
> of a poorly developed vocabulary which ranges from "cool" (or whatever
> the "in" terms are)
> to its opposite "uncool" (or whatever the "in" terms are).
>
> Fritz Goerling
>>
>> Rudy Troike
>>
>> * *
>>
>> LINGUIST List 16.2552
>> Mon Sep 05 2005
>> _________________________________________________________________
>>
>> From: Alexandra D'Arcy <alex.darcy [address-marker.gif]
>> utoronto.ca>
>> Subject: Like: Syntax and Development
>> Institution: University of Toronto
>> Program: Department of Linguistics
>> Dissertation Status: Completed
>> Degree Date: 2005
>> Author: Alexandra D'Arcy
>> Dissertation Title: Like: Syntax and Development
>>
>> Dissertation Director(s):
>> Sali Tagliamonte
>>
>> Dissertation Abstract:
>> Discourse LIKE, as in (1), is one of the most salient features of
>> present-day vernacular English.
>>
>> (1) a. LIKE, Carrie's LIKE a little LIKE out-of-it but LIKE she's
>> the
>> funniest. (3/T/f/18)
>> b. Well, you just cut out LIKE a girl figure and a boy figure.
>> (N/8/f/75)
>>
>> It is overtly stigmatized and associated with adolescents, where
>> it is
>> perceived as a crutch for lexical indecision (e.g., Diamond 2000;
>> Siegel 2000). In the literature, LIKE is sometimes characterized
>> as a
>> 'meaningless interjection' (OED) that can be used 'grammatically
>> anywhere' (Siegel 2002:64).
>>
>> Descriptions such as these suggest that LIKE is unconstrained, yet
>> language, despite inherent variability, is rule-governed (see also
>> Underhill 1988; Andersen 2001).
>>
>> LIKE has received much attention in the pragmatic literature (e.g.,
>> Schourup 1983; Andersen 1997 et seq.), but it has never been
>> investigated from a variationist perspective. Consequently, this
>> dissertation presents an accountable analysis of LIKE in a large
>> corpus
>> of contemporary English. The hypothesis developed in this work is
>> that
>> LIKE is not random, but interacts with syntactic structure in
>> regular
>> and predictable ways. To address this issue, the variable context
>> is
>> circumscribed according to structural criteria and the analyses are
>> embedded within current Minimalist Theory (e.g., Chomsky 1995 et
>> seq.). Over 20,000 structurally defined contexts are examined,
>> comprising data from 97 speakers between the ages of 10 and 87.
>>
>> This method reveals that LIKE is 1) highly constrained by the
>> syntax
>> and 2) occurs in specific positions among speakers of all ages.
>> Indeed,
>> examination of language-internal constraints reveals that the
>> community
>> shares a single variable grammar for LIKE (Poplack & Tagliamonte
>> 2001).
>> This feature is shown to have developed gradually and
>> systematically,
>> arriving at its current state through regular processes of language
>> change. Using the grammaticalization models proposed by Traugott
>> (1997
>> [1995]) and Brinton (forthcoming), it is argued that after
>> initially
>> developing as a discourse marker, where it occurs clause-initially
>> and
>> links sequences of dialogue (Fraser 1988, 1990), LIKE then begins
>> to
>> enter syntactic structure, spreading to one maximal projection at
>> a time.
>> _
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 5055 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lexicography/attachments/20050906/9a655fde/attachment.bin>
More information about the Lexicography
mailing list