[Lexicog] Re: The irony of thou
Bill Poser
billposer at ALUM.MIT.EDU
Sat Jun 9 17:50:37 UTC 2007
The other aspect of the tu/usted distinction about which I am
curious, and which I don't think anyone has touched on, is how
it arose in the first place. Neither Latin nor (ancient) Greek
had such a distinction (that is, it was just a singular/plural
distinction, without any connotations of intimacy or power), nor
is there any reason to think that there was such a distinction
in early Germanic, Baltic, or Slavic. Somehow the majority of
European languages developed this kind of distinction in the
Middle Ages. Why?
Bill
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lexicographylist/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lexicographylist/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:lexicographylist-digest at yahoogroups.com
mailto:lexicographylist-fullfeatured at yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
lexicographylist-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the Lexicography
mailing list