[Lexicog] Phrasefinder
bolstar1
bolstar1 at YAHOO.COM
Fri May 23 20:55:31 UTC 2008
Grant, Fred, et. al.: I tried the first phrase that came into my mind
in testing the site [phrases.org.uk]. I tried "In for a penny." I
expected to be met with a pound of aphorism, but I got a
googletudinous reply. I tried the yalequotes.com site, and I got
many, many quotes including "penny." This exemplifies the problem
that you alluded to -- the complex nature of phrases, and
phraseology, in general. It is also a reflection of the state of the
e-gravitating state of the lexicographical art. I would have
preferred a drilling tool to zero in on true "idioms" or "aphorisms"
or truly "quotable quotes."
Scott Nelson
--- In lexicographylist at yahoogroups.com, "Shapiro, Fred"
<fred.shapiro at ...> wrote:
>
>
> Grant has studied phrases.org.uk more than I have, so I accept his
statement that the quality is very variable. But there is definitely
good original research there, and it is worth consulting along with
other research tools. For example, I just looked up "a picture is
worth a thousand words." I did a lot of research on this for The
Yale Book of Quotations and pushed it back from the usually accepted
coinage by Frederick Barnard in the 1920s to a 1914 appearance in the
New York Times. But Phrasefinder, apparently searching
Newspaperarchive or Google News Archive, gives a 1911 citation from a
Syracuse newspaper. This is a major phrase discovery. I assume
there are other entries at this level, and in perusing the site I
found very good research, of a sort that only a small number of
people in the world would even think to do, in many entries.
>
> Fred Shapiro
> Editor
> Yale Book of Quotations (Yale University Press)
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: lexicographylist at yahoogroups.com
[lexicographylist at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Grant Barrett
[gbarrett at ...]
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 6:10 AM
> To: lexicographylist at yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Lexicog] Phrasefinder
>
> The quality of the scholarship at Phrases.org.uk is so variable that
> confirming an answer given there is an exercise in just going ahead
> and doing the research yourself.
>
> The site is interesting in that it occasionally touches upon
> expressions not well-covered elsewhere but by and large, outside the
> scant 1200 entries that are provided by the site, the content is
> almost exclusively made up of a forum where the clueless answer
> questions asked by the clueless.
>
> One is far more likely to find a satisfactory answer by searching
> Google Books or Amazon's full-text search. Or better, visiting a
> library.
>
> Grant Barrett
> gbarrett at ...
> 113 Park Place, Apt. 3
> Brooklyn, NY 11217
> (646) 286-2260
>
> >
> > Every once in a while we get an inquiry on this list about the
> > meaning of
> > some phrase or idiom, which engenders a particularistic reply (or
> > multiple
> > replies). I have been impressed with the judicious and
historically
> > interesting work of Gary Martin, whose Phrasefinder online source
is
> > very
> > impressive. Unless others have other opinions about this source,
I'd
> > like
> > to suggest that we simply routinely refer basic inquiries to this
> > site:
> >
> > http://www.phrases.org.uk/
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lexicographylist/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lexicographylist/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:lexicographylist-digest at yahoogroups.com
mailto:lexicographylist-fullfeatured at yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
lexicographylist-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the Lexicography
mailing list