[Lexicog] Derivations in Venda?
yahganlang
phonosemantics at EARTHLINK.NET
Wed Feb 4 21:44:29 UTC 2009
Hi folks, been a long time since last posting.
I'm currently working on a crosslinguistic survey of ideophones and
related phenomena in Niger-Congo languages. Many Bantu languages have
ideophones that do double-duty as verb roots, or extended stems.
I've spent the last couple of weeks doing an exhaustive analysis of
forms from the Venda dictionary compiled by Van Warmelo. I've found
that many of the forms with particular extender and derivative
strings are very tightly knit semantically (for instance, undoing bad
magical effects, or revealing hidden secrets for all to see, being
repressed, etc.)- this despite having quite various roots affixed.
Partially the semantics come from the spatial, voice, aspect senses
of the individual morphemes, but I'm a bit confused.
Were these forms put into the dictionary by the compiler BECAUSE they
have idiosyncratic meanings, or are they there because these
derivations are semantically delimited in these ways, and aren't as
productive as one might expect? Any advice here welcome. Thanks.
Jess Tauber
phonosemantics at earthlink.net
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lexicographylist/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lexicographylist/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:lexicographylist-digest at yahoogroups.com
mailto:lexicographylist-fullfeatured at yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
lexicographylist-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
More information about the Lexicography
mailing list