[Lexicog] agreed-upon minimum size for lexicographic corpora
Tsvi Sadan tsvi.sadan@gmail.com [lexicographylist]
lexicographylist at yahoogroups.com
Mon Jul 4 16:02:43 UTC 2016
I wonder if there is any agreed-upon minimum size for lexicographic
corpora though, for example, Atkins and Rundell write that there is no
such definitive minimum size in their "Oxford Guide to Practical
Lexicography" (2008: 61).
Does anyone on this list know publications that propose such minimal
size even if the proposed numbers have not been accepted by other
lexicographers?
Thank you very much in advance.
--
Tsvi Sadan
Senior Lecturer in Hebrew and Semitic Languages
Bar-Ilan University, Israel
http://biu.academia.edu/tsvisadan/
------------------------------------
Posted by: Tsvi Sadan <tsvi.sadan at gmail.com>
------------------------------------
------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lexicographylist/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lexicographylist/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
lexicographylist-digest at yahoogroups.com
lexicographylist-fullfeatured at yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
lexicographylist-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
More information about the Lexicography
mailing list