gquestion about LFG and Human Sentence Processing and Acquisition
Arnold D J
doug at essex.ac.uk
Wed Nov 3 18:33:56 UTC 1999
A couple of weeks ago, I posted a question to the list about
what recent work there might be in LFG and processing/acquisition.
I got several replies (see below), thanks to all of you.
In general, they confirm the impression that there has not been much
work in these areas.
Below you will find a summary of what the responses said, and then a
list of `classic' (i.e. non-recent) papers in the area that I put
together myself by searching the LFG bibliography.
#---------------------------------------------------------------
Wataru Nakamura <nakamura at e-one.uec.ac.jp> suggests:
Manfred Pienemann (1998) Language Processing and Second Language
Development: Processability Theory. John Benjamins.
Peter Hancox <P.J.Hancox at bham.ac.uk> suggests:
Gaylard, H. L. (1995), Phrase Structure in a Computational Model of
Child Language Acquisition, PhD Thesis, University of
Birmingham
http://admin.ccl.umist.ac.uk/ra/heleng/#phd
Abstract:
This thesis describes a computational model of child
language acquisition which acquires a recursive
phrase-structure grammar in the absence of X-Bar Theory. The
model assumes no grammar, lexicon, or segmentation. Input
utterances include phrases as well as sentences, of no more
than two levels of embedding, paired with their semantic
representations. The initial products of acquisition are a
lexicon of unanalysed utterances and a finite-state
grammar. The lexical items acquired guide further lexical
acquisition, which results in their segmentation, and thus
triggers the acquisition of a phrase-structure grammar. The
Lexical-Functional Grammar formalism is used, so that
acquiring C-Structure, or phrase structure, can be viewed as
mapping the ordered utterance onto the unordered F-Structure,
a shallow semantic representation. Generalization over the
phrase structure rules acquired results in the induction of
syntactic categories, and it is this which gives rise to
recursion in the grammar. The model demonstrates both Degree-2
learnability and incremental learning in accordance with the
gradual nature of child language development. Birmingham.
Joan Bresnan <bresnan at csli.Stanford.EDU> reports that:
"Prof. Michiko Nakano gave several papers at AILA 99 in Tokyo on
experimental results regarding second lg learning and their
implications for LFG. Peter Sells gave a review paper on this topic"
However, I haven't been able to trace any of these papers.
She also reminds us that Pinker's LFG based book on Lg Acquisition
(see below) has come out in a second edition, and notes that
Both DOP-LFG and OT-LFG have attracted some formal attention in
relation to learnability and/parsing. (However, here `parsing' tends
not to mean `human' sentence processing). The relevant sites are:
http://www-lfg.stanford.edu/lfg/lfg-dop/
http://www-lfg.stanford.edu/lfg/ot-lfg/ot-lfg.html
And here are some `classic papers' on the subject of LFG and Human
Sentence Processing/Language Acquisition.
Maria Babyonyshev. Acquisition of the Russian case system. In MIT
Working Papers in Linguistics 19, pages 1--43. MIT, Department
of Linguistics and Philosophy, 1993.
Marilyn Ford. Parsing complexity and a theory of parsing. In Greg
N. Carlson and Michael K. Tanenhaus, editors, Linguistic
Structure in Language Processing. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1988.
Rick Kazman. Simulating the child's acquisition of the lexicon and
syntax-experiences with Babel. Machine Learning, 160 (1-2):0
87--120, 1994.
Jay Kim. Parsing the Korean verb. In Proceedings of the Sixth
International Conference on Korean Linguistics, Seoul,
1988. International Circle of Korean Linguistics.
Jeong-Ryeol Kim. Parsing light verb constructions in
Lexical-Functional Grammar. Ohak Yonku / Language
Research, 290 (4):0 535--566, 1993.
Young-Joo Kim. Theoretical implications of complement structure
acquisition in Korean. Journal of Child Language, 160 (3):0
573--598, 1989.
Steven Pinker. A theory of the acquisition of lexical-interpretive
grammars. In Joan Bresnan, editor, The Mental Representation
of Grammatical Relations, pages 655--726. The MIT Press,
Cambridge, MA, 1982.
Steven Pinker. Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument
Structure. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1989a.
#---------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks to
Wataru Nakamura <nakamura at e-one.uec.ac.jp>
Farrell Ackerman <fackerman at ucsd.edu>
Peter Hancox <P.J.Hancox at bham.ac.uk>
Joan Bresnan <bresnan at csli.Stanford.EDU>
kersti.borjars at man.ac.uk (Kersti Borjars)
------------------------------------------------------------------
Doug Arnold, doug at essex.ac.uk
Dept. of Language & Linguistics, http://clwww.essex.ac.uk/~doug
University of Essex,
Wivenhoe Park, Tel: +44 1206 872084 (direct)
Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK. Fax: +44 1206 872198/872085
------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the LFG
mailing list