Indian government delays approving many Fulbright projects

[Harold F. Schiffman]

 http://chronicle.com/daily/2007/02/2007021904n.htm
Monday, February 19, 2007


Fulbright Scholars to India Upset Over Lengthy Clearance Delays and
Denials
By SHAILAJA NEELAKANTAN


New Delhi

The Indian government has delayed approving the projects of dozens of
Fulbright scholars for months and has rejected some projects without
explanation -- a move observers believe is an attempt to force the
scholars to change their research topics. The rejections and months-long
delays have put a number of the scholars into professional and personal
limbo, and have upset officials at the U.S.  Embassy in New Delhi and the
United States Education Foundation in India, which runs the Fulbright
program there. "Through these delays and censorship efforts, the
government of India is harming those Americans who have invested their
careers and aspirations in the U.S.-India relationship," said Larry
Schwartz, public-affairs officer at the embassy. "These are people who
would have become India's most vigorous advocates in the U.S."

Of the 94 Americans awarded Fulbright scholarships to India for the 2006-7
academic year, only 17 received their clearances within six months of
applying, according to Jane E. Schukoske, executive director of the
educational foundation in India. Most of the rest experienced delays of
five to 10 months. As of mid-February, 10 academics were still waiting for
their clearances, including seven whose initial applications were still
pending and three who changed their research topics after being rejected.
Some scholars who were rejected reapplied after changing their subjects
while others decided not to reapply. The research subjects rejected by the
Indian government, without explanation, include studies of language
ideologies in the schools of Mumbai, India's financial capital (formerly
known as Bombay), to which millions of Indians from others states migrate;
of democratization in Kerala, a southern Indian state where India's
communist parties have been influential; and of Muslim women's perceptions
of the role of women in society.

India's Ministry of Human Resource Development coordinates the proposal
reviews, also called the visa-authorization process. That clearance
precedes application for the visa itself. Until recently, said Ms.
Schukoske, the ministry's Web site said that projects were usually
approved within three months. Repeated calls to the ministry requesting
comment were not returned. Many scholars applied for their clearances in
March 2006, expecting to begin their research in India by the end of
August, but did not receive approval in time. An orientation program in
New Delhi, typically scheduled for late August or early September, was
canceled because of the delays.  The clearance delays began with the
previous year's awardees, only 54 percent of whom received clearances
within six months.

"These delays have caused serious hardships for many of our scholars,"
said Ms. Schukoske, noting that the review process is at odds with the
rest of the Fulbright experience in India. "Once scholars are cleared and
begin their Fulbright grants, they enjoy warm welcome and energetically
pursue their projects with support from their Indian colleagues." A number
of scholars who spoke to The Chronicle were both angered and perplexed by
their treatment. Some of those still awaiting clearances had decided to
come to India on tourist visas and sit out the waiting period here. Having
left their full-time jobs in the United States and, in some cases, having
no other means of support, they noted that, at least, living in India is
cheaper.

"Frankly, my research is in jeopardy, and I've spent most of my savings,
and I don't think I can afford to stay much longer," said Forrest
Fleischman, who arrived in India in September on a tourist visa. In
mid-February, he said, he was told that the Ministry of Home Affairs, one
of several government agencies that screens the proposals, had placed
"adverse comments" in his file. "While there is no final word, it seems
highly probable that my application is about to be rejected," Mr.
Fleischman said. He had planned to focus his research on political
empowerment and biodiversity protection in Kerala's agricultural
ecosystem. The home ministry deals with matters of domestic security, and
Mr. Fleischman says his project has no negative implications on
domestic-security concerns.

"I've spent the last nine months planning my life around this project," he
said. "I have made it the cornerstone of my graduate-school application --
and hoped to make it a core of my doctoral work." Last September the Board
of Directors of the educational foundation in India sent a statement of
concern to the Ministry of Human Resource Development, the Ministry of
Home Affairs, and the Ministry of External Affairs, urging them to
expedite the review process, and noting that many of the scholars
"relinquished their normal duties or studies, and, in some cases, their
spouses and children have left jobs and school." Anupama Bhatnagar, a
member of the foundation who is deputy secretary at the human-resource
ministry, did not sign this statement. Ms. Bhatnagar did not return
repeated calls made to her office by The Chronicle.

Aseem Sharma, a foundation board member who is president of Corning SA,
India, said in a faxed message that he and others on the board had been in
regular touch with the ministries since sending the letter. "I am not
aware of any response from the ministries to the board," he wrote. In
December, 33 Fulbright scholars sent a petition U.S. Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice, urging her to get involved in the matter. "When we
received our acceptance letters, we understood our selection to be a great
honor and a prestigious career boost; for many of us, it has instead
become a financially and emotionally debilitating obstacle," the petition
says. The signers add that they have received no funding or accurate
information that would help them plan for the future, and that many of
them are without incomes and health insurance.

Secretary Rice did not respond to the letter, but Thomas A. Farrell, the
State Department's deputy assistant secretary for academic programs, said
the United States had raised the problem with the Indian authorities "at
an extremely high level." In October Mr. Farrell met with the Indian charg
d'affaires -- the second in command at the Indian embassy in Washington --
to discuss the issue.  Since then, he said, "we've gotten a substantial
resolution of the problem." He added: "The backlog is virtually cleared."
Mr. Farrell characterized the problem as an "ongoing issue that has been
around for a number of years." He said it had grown more acute as the
number of American scholars seeking visas to India has grown. The problem
does not represent any anti-American hostility on the part of Indian
officials, he said. Instead, it is strictly "an issue of bureaucracy."

That is little consolation for those who have suffered through lengthy
delays or failed to get their clearances. Tariq Tapa, whose documentary
film project, "The Imaginary Princess: A Muslim Girl's Story," was
rejected, decided not to change his subject and re-apply. "Given the
choice between either churning out a half-baked proposal just for the sake
of getting back on the one-year merry-go-round with still no guarantee of
success, or just walking away clean, I chose to walk," said Mr. Tapa. "I
spent years researching it and months preparing the proposal and building
the contacts and context to give it integrity. Starting over from scratch
and handing something in during the space of a few weeks was more than
absurd; it was offensive, as if I were writing a thank-you note and not a
graduate dissertation due in the time I promised my department."

Instead, Mr. Tapa, who said he began to suspect months ago that his
project would be rejected, privately raised money to shoot his film. He
came to India on a tourist visa last October, has begun shooting his
documentary, and expects to finish on time, this April, as planned. "But I
am now required to begin repayment on student loans because I no longer
qualify for an academic deferral," he said. "So, to be quite honest,
becoming a Fulbrighter has been one of the most financially and
emotionally regretful experiences of my life."

Burton Bollag contributed to this article from Washington.

http://chronicle.com/daily/2007/02/2007021904n.htm

***********************************************************************************

N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or sponsor of
the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who disagree with a
message are encouraged to post a rebuttal.

***********************************************************************************