A “Times” journalist interviews Trevor Phi llips on current British immigration policy

Harold Schiffman hfsclpp at gmail.com
Mon Sep 24 13:10:14 UTC 2007


 Immigration Watch International <http://jonjayray.wordpress.com/>
 Current British immigration
policy<http://jonjayray.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/current-british-immigration-policy/>

September 24, 2007 at 9:30 am · Filed under
Uncategorized<http://jonjayray.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/>

*A "Times" journalist interviews Trevor Phillips*

Last weekend I went for a walk on Hampstead Heath. As we meandered beneath
the trees we saw lots of other families just like us; but none of them was
speaking English. A few days later I took the bus to Soho – again not one of
the many conversations going on around me was in my language. I love the
diversity, energy and prosperity that people from all over the world bring
to London. But sometimes I get that strange sense of not feeling at home in
my own town. And I'm not the only one: last week one of Gordon Brown's "ask
the people" roadshows found the public rate immigration as a more urgent
priority than education or terrorism.

And while a plethora of races and cultures is the norm now in Britain's
multi-ethnic cities, the recent influx (in the 1990s 1.2m more people came
to live here once those who've emigrated are accounted for – and that's just
the official statistics) means that rural areas and smaller towns are having
to integrate large foreign populations too. Julie Spence, the chief
constable of Cambridgeshire, spoke last week about the cost and cultural
clashes of having large numbers of eastern Europeans on her patch.

It is not just the police who are being squeezed, but doctors' surgeries and
schools all over Britain. To get a sense of the scale of the nonplanning,
the Home Office estimated that no more than 13,000 eastern Europeans from
the accession states would come to Britain annually: 720,000 have
registered. And nobody is counting the Iraqis, Kurds and Afghans sneaking in
every night through our ports. Or the Chinese smuggled in by people
traffickers, the Somali refugees . . . No wonder the public is worried.

So to get a sense of where all of this is going, I went to meet the man who
is paid to engender social cohesion, Trevor Phillips, formerly the head of
the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) and now in charge of the Commission
for Equality and Human Rights which takes over the responsibilities of the
CRE, the Equal Opportunities Commission and the Disability Rights Commission
next week. A veteran of race politics, it was Phillips who declared that
multiculturalism wasn't working, sounding the death knell for that oh so
British doctrine that for 30 years decreed we should live alongside each
other, let different communities and races do their own thing and not worry
about integration, helping immigrants learn English or inculcating British
values. It was a doctrine that died on 7/7 when British-born Muslim suicide
bombers murdered their fellow citizens.

Though undoubtedly the right thing to do, Phillips's condemnation of
multiculturalism made him massively unpopular with many of his former
brothers – as I found out when I interviewed him about his new job on stage
at the CRE's farewell race convention last year. I was there to talk to him
about the role of the new commission. Questions from the floor were hostile.
Voices were raised. Many veterans of the race riots of the 1970s saw
Phillips as a sell-out, furious that the focus on race was to be lost as the
CRE merged into a wider body. Phillips was taken aback by the "bullying"
attitudes.

This time we are in his offices in Victoria Street without an audience, but
he is still uncompromising on his old comrades. "They have to grow up. That
militancy must be consigned to the dustbin of history. The CRE was set up to
deal with a different set of circumstances. Now we have to chart a course
for how we can deal with difference. We have to be more proactive and more
friendly." Race is, as he puts it, "no longer black and white". In terms of
life chances, a black African girl is likely to do better than a white
British boy. A Chinese baby born today will probably be much better paid
than his or her white contemporaries. It is no longer the case that ethnic
minority kids get a raw deal because of white racism.

But despite such progress, Phillips is aware of the challenges we face to
integrate the new arrivals. "We are now in the age of difference, not just
in our big cities, but everywhere. We are all struggling to get used to
this. But people like Andrew Green at Migrationwatch are saying these new
arrivals can't fit in. I believe that shows contempt for the tolerance of
the British people. As a nation, because of being Welsh, Scots, Irish,
English and still British we are pretty good at absorbing people. Once we
get our brains in gear and stop being frightened about race, we are pretty
good in this country at doing the immigration job. We just have to treat it
positively. We have to tell immigrants the rules and what we expect." Tell
that to Cambridgeshire police.

He puts much of the anxiety about this down to "bad government planning
which has made this all much more difficult. It's not controlled and not
managed. There are definitely issues of competence over the numbers coming
here. And many of the problems we are seeing are happening because of that
bad management".

Now, he believes, the government is getting to grips with it. He cites Liam
Byrne, the immigration minister, with whom he says he has worked closely on
this, (not one for hiding his light under a bushel, Phillips) for going in
the right direction. Byrne, he says, has started counting both the number of
people coming to Britain and the number leaving. And it was Byrne who this
year finally admitted the public was right to be worried about immigration.
Labour is realising they have to talk about this which is why Gordon Brown
has been banging on about Britishness: expect to hear lots about "identity
politics" at the Labour conference this week. Slowly politicians are
beginning to grasp the nettle. Why has it taken so long?

"Governments since the 1960s have been terrified of talking about race
because of the spectre of Enoch Powell," says Phillips. "They are scared of
raising these issues for fear of being branded racist. But we must be able
to have an honest conversation about racial difference and immigration. We
must recognise diversity, not pretend it doesn't exist. It is okay to say 'I
don't like what you do', but not okay to say 'I don't like what you are'.
Many of us don't know how to talk to each other. My job is to work out how
to make it work."

So what are his proposals? He thinks that in divided communities such as
Oldham or Burnley that rather than quotas to mix the races in schools, or
bussing pupils from one part of town to another, the key is getting
different kinds of kids together for music or sport – or sending them on
summer camps (all things his new body will be advocating and funding).

As for the political challenge, Phillips is upbeat. "Gordon is pretty smart
on this, he's seen that there are two great challenges at the moment. 1) How
do we live with the planet? 2) How do we live with each other? The one most
likely to destroy civilisation in my view is that we can't live with each
other. "Gordon has spotted that what we really fear is the consequence of
this rushing tide of turbulence of diversity, which is why he is
concentrating on the identity, Britishness, which will form a glue that will
keep us together while everything is conspiring to force us apart."

I'm not so sure that "Britishness" is the superglue he and Brown believe.
What is it? Its purest expression is the Rule Britannia fest of the Last
Night of the Proms – and there were precious few brown faces there, however
hard the BBC tried to find them. But luckily, as well as Britishness,
Phillips has some radical prescriptions for our unease. First he says that
every immigrant must learn English, that the days of council-funded
interpreters and translations on tap are over. "English is a sine qua non.
And when we've surveyed this, the people who are most keen that immigrants
learn English are former immigrants. They know that if you don't have
English you are shut out."

He tells me about going to Bradford and Oldham and the middle-aged
Bangladeshi ladies he's met learning English alongside their children on a
special bus. Looking stern, he says there is no place in society for wives
forbidden by their husbands from taking part – these men must "get over it":
it's official, the "live and let live" attitude to subjugating women, or
honour killings or extremism is over. Multiculturalism RIP.

Even more controversially, Phillips is advocating a two-track immigration
system. The United Nations says 200m people do not live and work in the
country they were born in. "This is not a fearsome tide of refugees, but
people coming to find work. We need them." But, he says, we need to
distinguish between those who want to work for a while and go home and those
"wanting to be citizens". Most crucial, he thinks, is "to have a system
where, frankly, people can leave easily. One of the reasons people come and
they stay is that they are worried that if they leave they won't get back in
. . . I think we should make that entry and exit easier – give people a
permit to be a waiter or whatever, rather than coming in on a lorry." That
requires a more flexible and coherent system. "It's different from 50 years
ago when my parents came from Guyana – then it was difficult to go back
home. Whereas now people virtually commute from Warsaw. If we are too scared
about immigration we force people to be here all the time."

That would be one track, a kind of semi-citizenship for transitory workers
where temporary migrants pay for public services such as health, education
and welfare before being entitled to work here. "Then there needs to be
another track for people who want to come and be British. There are lots of
people who like what we are and want to be part of it. I like proposals that
such people should do voluntary work, that they have to display their desire
for citizenship. It is all part of the desire for integration." He is
passionate about "equality" – a key part of the new body. White people are
part of this too. "It's not right that whites should be queue-jumped on
things like housing."

Does he think America has lessons for us? "Absolutely not. It's a myth that
they are a nation of immigrants that all muck in together. The US is a
racially segregated society. I don't want that for this country. When I go
to America to see my relations I can be there for four or five weeks and
never speak to a white person. I hate that."

<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article2510762.ece>




-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
sponsor of
the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who disagree
with a
message are encouraged to post a rebuttal. (H. Schiffman, Moderator)
*******************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20070924/b7fa8f0a/attachment.html>


More information about the Lgpolicy-list mailing list