Researchers: IM definitely infectious, but associated linguistic damage short-lived, haha
Dennis Baron
debaron at uiuc.edu
Sat Apr 26 00:29:52 UTC 2008
There's a new post on the Web of Language --
Researchers: IM definitely infectious, but associated linguistic
damage short-lived, haha
James H. Billington, the Librarian of Congress, recently charged that
internet chat and cell phone text messaging were causing “the slow
destruction of the basic unit of human thought — the sentence.”
Despite the fact that neuroscientists are nowhere near isolating the
basic unit of human thought, and linguists can’t agree on a
definition of a sentence, Billington wants to place a Librarian
General’s warning on all cell phones that texting kills thought.
But although you’ll have to pry their cell phones from their cold,
dead hands before teenagers will give up messaging, their brains are
in no danger from the controversial symptoms frequently associated
with this popular activity: lol, brb, ttfn, gtg, lmao, and the use of
u for you.
Writing in the latest issue of American Speech, two researchers at
the University of Toronto have found that high-school-aged users of
IM quickly abandon many of the stereotypical abbreviations associated
with the activity, and that while some of them occasionally inject an
“OMG, OMG,” into their conversation, such alphabetisms inflict no
more linguistic damage than Ben Bernanke mentioning “NGO’s” at a
meeting of the Fed or David Petraeus discussing the effects of
“IED’s” before a Congressional hearing. OK, maybe IED’s aren't the
best example....
Read the rest at the Web of Language
Dennis B.
Dennis Baron
Professor of English and Linguistics
Department of English
University of Illinois
608 S. Wright St.
Urbana, IL 61801
office: 217-244-0568
fax: 217-333-4321
www.uiuc.edu/goto/debaron
read the Web of Language:
www.uiuc.edu/goto/weboflanguage
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lgpolicy-list/attachments/20080425/0457a054/attachment.htm>
More information about the Lgpolicy-list
mailing list