Sounds like Greek to me
robert.lawless at wichita.edu
Sat Dec 13 20:57:35 UTC 2008
Ron. Do you realize that you are misunderstood practically every time
you get on this issue -- on this and other lists? Ever time you declare
that the analytic model is a superior explanatory tool to folk
perspective, you are accused of denigrating folk beliefs. The reaction
is worth a paper in itself. Robert.
Ronald Kephart wrote:
> On 12/12/08 2:02 PM, "Lynn Goldstein" <lgoldstein at miis.edu> wrote:
>> I am quite interested in folk linguistics and I strongly believe that
>> these types of statements and beliefs , while subjective, have great
>> linguistic/scientific merit. Understanding and describing people's folk
>> views should be an essential part of linguistics.
> Yes, I was unclear. I didn't mean that the attitudes and evaluations of
> language don't have merit as objects of study in and of themselves. I only
> meant that they do not have merit as scientific evaluations of language. And
> I do think that it's important that our students know this. I teach an intro
> class for mostly English Lit and Ed majors, and I spend a lot of time on
> this issue.
> I especially hope you'll share whatever you discover about folk views of
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 239 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Lgpolicy-list