'Status' drives extinction of languages

[Francis Hult]

<<The researchers point out that bilingual societies do exist: "But the
histories of countries where two languages co-exist today generally
involve split populations that lived without significant interaction,
effectively in separate, monolingual societies. Only recently have
these communities begun to mix, allowing language competition to
begin." >>
 
Interesting...this is the same argument one often hears from English-Only supporters.
 
Francis
 
 
--
Francis M. Hult, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Bicultural-Bilingual Studies
University of Texas at San Antonio
 
Web: http://faculty.coehd.utsa.edu/fhult/
 

________________________________

From: owner-lgpolicy-list at ccat.sas.upenn.edu on behalf of Harold Schiffman
Sent: Thu 2/14/2008 9:27 AM
To: lp
Subject: 'Status' drives extinction of languages



'Status' drives extinction of languages
Bob Beale
ABC Science Online

 Thursday, 21 August 2003





A language's status in society is the best way to predict if it is
headed for extinction Languages evolve and compete with each other
much like plants and animals, but those driven to extinction are
almost always tongues with a low social status, U.S. research shows.
The social status of a language is the most accurate way of predicting
whether it will survive, argue researchers in a paper appearing today
in the journal, Nature . They also suggest that active intervention to
boost the status of rare and endangered languages can save them.
"Thousands of the world's languages are vanishing at an alarming rate,
with 90% of them being expected to disappear with the current
generation," warned Dr Daniel Abrams and Professor Steven Strogatz,
both of Cornell University in New York.

The pair have developed a simple mathematical model of language
competition to explain how dialects such as Welsh, Scottish Gaelic and
Quechua - the most common surviving indigenous language in the
Americas - have lost out to more dominant tongues.
The model is based on data they collected on the number of speakers of
endangered languages - in 42 regions of Peru, Scotland, Wales,
Bolivia, Ireland and Alsaçe-Lorraine - over time. All have been in
steep decline over the past century or so, and the model suggests that
Scottish Gaelic and Quechua will be close to extinct by about 2030.

Previous models of language dynamics have focused on the transmission
and evolution of syntax, grammar or other structural properties of a
language itself. Yet by comparing various influences that help to
explain the steadily declining numbers of speakers of each language,
Abrams and Strogatz singled out status as the single most significant
factor that could predict its extinction threat.

"Quechua, for example, still has many speakers in Huanuco, Peru," they
note. "But its low status is driving a rapid shift to Spanish, which
leads to an unfortunate situation in which a child cannot communicate
with his or her grandparents." A language's fate generally depends on
both its number of speakers and its perceived status, the latter
usually reflecting the social or economic opportunities afforded to
its speakers, they said. When two languages are in competition, the
one that offers the greatest opportunities to its speakers will
usually prevail.

The researchers point out that bilingual societies do exist: "But the
histories of countries where two languages co-exist today generally
involve split populations that lived without significant interaction,
effectively in separate, monolingual societies. Only recently have
these communities begun to mix, allowing language competition to
begin." They urged active intervention to slow the global rate of
language decline, pointing out that their model also predicts that
higher status will keep a language alive. They also cite a real-life
instance where this has happened: "The example of Québec French
demonstrates that language decline can be slowed by strategies such as
policy-making, education and advertising, in essence increasing an
endangered language's status."
Similar measures may make a difference elsewhere, they argued.

http://www.clipclip.org/Bevsiem/clips/detail/66166

--
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
or sponsor of
the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a
message are encouraged to post a rebuttal. (H. Schiffman, Moderator)
*******************************************