Gender neutral terms: Ann Bodine as an antidote to David Gelernter.
Amy Sheldon
asheldon at umn.edu
Fri Mar 7 03:23:19 UTC 2008
David Gelernter's rant against women ruining English is not very
original and not well-informed. He'd do well to do some background
reading in Ann Bodine's eye-opening history of singular 'they' and
the so-called generic 'he':
Ann Bodine. 1975. Anfrocentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular
"they", sex-indefinite "he", and "he or she". _Language in Society_
4:129-146.
Bodine writes about the far older and more pervasive masculinist
ideological incubator. 16th Century male grammarians were prescribing
usage based on masculinist gender ideology served up as the
"natural" order of things. They were arguing that the word order in
the phrase 'he or she' was justified because males are more worthy
than females. The feminist attempts to reform sexist language
practices and pronouncements that he maligns are a response to such
bias. Since singular 'they' has been in common use for centuries,
that hardly counts as a feminist conspiracy either.
Language Log also weighed in on March 2, 2008, on Mr. Gelernter's
rant and you can find it here:
http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/005423.html
Amy Sheldon
More information about the Lgpolicy-list
mailing list