Referendum battles in US election , including officialization of English
Harold Schiffman
hfsclpp at gmail.com
Mon Nov 3 15:24:52 UTC 2008
Referendum battles in US election
By Max Deveson
BBC News, Washington
When American voters go to the polls on 4 November, they will not just
be choosing a president. The issue of same-sex marriage has divided
opinion in California In many states, they will also be faced with a
number of referendum questions, known as propositions or ballot
initiatives. If passed, they will change state laws. And many of them
deal with issues on the frontline of American politics, from gay
marriage to abortion.
The most high-profile ballot initiative in this election cycle is
probably California's Proposition Eight, or Prop Eight, as it is known
for short. If passed, it would amend California's constitution to say:
"Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognised in
California." The proposition has been put forward by opponents of gay
marriage in the state, in response to the California Supreme Court's
decision in May 2008 to overturn a law introduced by a 2000
proposition, which had defined marriage in state law as being between
a man and a woman only. Opponents of same-sex marriage want to place
their definition of marriage in the state's constitution, thus
preventing the state's Supreme Court from overturning it.
California's Proposition Two would outlaw battery farming
Although Californian voters opted in 2000 to outlaw same-sex marriage,
the battle this year is very tight. Polls suggest that voters now
oppose attempts to amend the constitution, albeit by a very small
margin. Opponents of the measure say they may be helped by the
popularity of Barack Obama at the top of the ballot - but also harmed.
Mr Obama will bring out liberal voters who support same-sex marriage,
but he will also increase turnout among African-Americans, many of
whom oppose it. Voters in two other states - Florida and Arizona -
will also consider constitutional amendments to ban same-sex marriage.
'Right to know'
In California - which has a long history of direct democracy - voters
will also be asked to approve measures to raise renewable energy
targets, and "prohibit the confinement of farm animals in a manner
that does not allow them to turn around freely, lie down, stand up,
and fully extend their limbs" - a move aimed at outlawing battery
poultry farming. And Californians will also be faced with a
proposition to introduce a so-called "Sarah's Law", which would
prevent minors from getting an abortion until 48 hours after their
parents or guardians had been notified.
Parents have a right to know about their daughter's abortion
Orange County Register
The proposition has divided opinion in the state, with the latest poll
suggesting 46% of voters are in favour, with 44% opposed and 10%
undecided. Newspapers in the state are also on opposition sides of
the debate: the Los Angeles Times advises a "No" vote, for fear that
"some girls will seek out illegal abortions rather than notify their
parents", while the Orange County Register urges a "Yes" on the basis
that "parents have a right to know about their daughter's abortion".
Two other states will also be voting on propositions dealing with the
issue of abortion.
In South Dakota, voters will be asked to approve an amendment to the
state's constitution that would ban all abortions in the state except
in cases of rape or incest or to protect the woman's health. And in
Colorado, there is a proposition to define "personhood" as beginning
at the moment of fertilisation, rather than when an egg is implanted
in the uterus. Opponents of the measure say it would outlaw certain
forms of contraception, which prevent implantation (but not
fertilisation). The proposition - known to its supporters as the
"Equal Rights Amendment" - is unlikely to pass.
Electoral ploy
Aside from the issues of abortion and gay marriage, few subjects
excite so much passion in US politics as immigration.
Some Americans have become increasingly fearful that - as Hispanic
immigration increases - the English language is in decline.
Two states will vote this year on propositions aimed at reversing this
perceived decline. In Oregon, Ballot Measure 58 would prohibit schools
from teaching foreign students in their native language after one year
in elementary school or two years in high school. And in Missouri,
Constitutional Amendment One would "establish English as the official
language for all government meetings where public business is
discussed or decided or where public policy is formulated". Neither
measure has much likelihood of being passed.
But, like this year's other ballot measures, they might succeed in
bringing people out to the polls, thus helping candidates elsewhere on
the ballot. Indeed, many commentators have suggested that putting
controversial propositions on the ballot has been used as an electoral
ploy in recent years to bring out the base. In particular, observers
say the large number of anti-gay marriage measures on the ballot in
2004 may well have been put there in order to increase turnout among
social conservatives and give George W Bush a boost in the
presidential election - a factor which may well have pushed him over
the top in marginal states like Ohio.
This year, the Democrats may be attempting to use similar tactics:
voters in Colorado and Missouri will be considering propositions on
union rights, which could encourage blue-collar Democrats to come to
the polls. In total, there will be 153 propositions or initiatives on
the ballot in 36 states this year. How Americans vote on them will
tell us just as much - if not more - about public opinion in America
than will the results of the presidential election.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/us_elections_2008/7696178.stm
--
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
or sponsor of
the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who
disagree with a
message are encouraged to post a rebuttal. (H. Schiffman, Moderator)
*******************************************
More information about the Lgpolicy-list
mailing list