Arizona: ELL students' class time isn't great, but it's 'good enough'
hfsclpp at gmail.com
Thu Oct 9 17:06:07 UTC 2008
*ELL students' class time isn't great, but it's 'good
By Rhonda Bodfield
ARIZONA DAILY STAR
When school started this year, districts across the state were supposed to
put students with poor or non-existent English skills into
language-development classes for four hours a day. Mostly, it's not
happening. In part, it's because there were a number of exceptions written
into the plan so schools with few English learners or schools participating
in certain approved reading programs are excluded from the requirement.
Also, districts are having a hard time pulling it off with available
resources. Although the districts submitted funding requests of about $274
million, the state set aside $40 million. And some districts, such as the
Tucson Unified School District, received no new money to comply with the new
Of the 75 elementary schools in TUSD, for example, only 29 would technically
be required to have four-hour blocks. Fewer than five are pulling it off,
said Steve Holmes, the chief academic officer in charge of the
Holmes, who said the district needed 100 new positions to be able to fully
comply, has set up a meeting with officials from the state Education
Department to explain that despite good-faith efforts, this year is simply
going to have to be a transition year.
"We're willing to do it, but we're between a rock and a hard place because
we don't have the resources to do four hours across the board," he said.
"We're doing the best we can, and this year that's going to have to be good
"Good enough" appears to be close enough this time around.
Tom Horne, the state schools chief, said although the four-hour standard is
not being universally met, none of the districts is being "defiant."
"My people tell me that the districts are all making a good-faith effort,
and we're going to use common sense in making sure that they become fully
compliant within a reasonable time," Horne said.
He remains convinced it's a good plan and said he anticipates that students
will get reclassified faster out of remedial English classes. Previously, he
said, some schools offered only half an hour of language development a day.
"It's going to be one of the most important things we've done in education
in Arizona for a long time," he said. "The rate at which students are going
to be learning English is going to soar."
Horne points to the success of some districts that started the new model
early. The Florence Unified School District, for example, was able to
reclassify 38 percent of its English learners after a year of the program,
more than double its earlier reclassification rate of 15 percent. Humboldt
Unified School District, near Prescott, went from 12 percent to 28 percent,
In Tucson, one of the few schools in which the model is in full bloom is
Cragin Elementary School, 2945 N. Tucson Blvd., where school officials are
skeptical but complying.
Principal Pearl Miller cited a number of concerns.
Putting only English learners in one class together means that some classes
are quite small. In third and fourth grade, for example, there are 18
students per class. Other mainstream classes, though, get stuffed full.
With only about six hours of instructional time in a day, she said, working
on language skills for four hours doesn't leave much time for other
subjects, especially since the school has decided all students should
continue getting an hour of math.
And finally, there's the philosophical concern about isolating students from
their English-speaking counterparts.
"Our staff is well-trained and committed, and logistically we are able to do
it, but we don't really feel good about the segregation that's occurring.
It's hard for us to say we're proud of our diversity here, and then say,
'Over here, in this separate room, is where we teach our students learning
English,' " she said.
Saralinda Mendivil, a fourth-grade teacher who has taught at Cragin for
seven years, said she is thrilled with the smaller class size because
classroom management comes easier and she's able to give students more
individualized attention. Still, she continues to have reservations.
"Philosophically, we believe that everyone learns from each other," she
said, adding that in a more traditional classroom, English-speaking students
could partner with those with fewer language skills and model for them.
"They're still able to help each other at different levels, but if you want
a true model, they should be around other English-speaking children."
Last year, she said, her fourth-graders already were doing a good deal of
work to prepare for the science portion of the AIMS test, which got off the
ground last year. This year, she's squeezing it in when she can, along with
social studies and history when possible.
"They're still getting some exposure, but not in the way that would serve
them the best."
Horne said teaching language skills doesn't mean core academics must be
neglected. Instead, language skills should be incorporated into those
subjects, he said. "Secondly, it's four hours, so there are still two more
hours for other subjects," he said, adding there's always summer school if
students still need to catch up.
Cragin parent Karla Muñoz, 36, said her 6-year-old first-grader, Keiji, is
happier this year than he was in kindergarten last year. "I think it's
better," the native Spanish speaker said.
"Last year, he didn't like getting pulled out. He kept asking why he had to
leave and what the other students were doing while he was gone. He feels
better about it now, because he doesn't feel so different."
Teacher Mendivil acknowledged that the students didn't like the pull-out.
She said when she explained at the beginning of the year how things were
going to work, a cheer went up when she told them they wouldn't be taken out
of class for separate language development.
But, she said, the students also realized right away that they were
separated from their old friends.
"I tried to just be forthright with them. I told them they should never be
ashamed of their culture and their language, but they're here in the United
States and we need to make sure they can master the language so they can
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to its
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner or
the list as to the veracity of a message's contents. Members who disagree
message are encouraged to post a rebuttal. (H. Schiffman, Moderator)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Lgpolicy-list