[lg policy] Ghana: New language policy to fail

[Harold Schiffman]

New language policy to fail

Last Updated: Tuesday, 1 December 2009, 2:36 GMT Previous Page

They say it is informed by research and that if it’s allowed to run
its course, it could turn out to be one of the best educational
policies the country has ever had. Teachers have apparently been
trained to implement it and make sure that it attains the desired
results. Yet, it has failure written all over it. The decision to use
languages other than English as the medium of instruction in the first
three years of basic education will hurt the nation. With this policy
the managers of the Ghanaian educational system are embarking, yet
again, on needless experiment that will not help anyone.  They
travelled to places like Kenya and Tanzania where they saw that pupils
were being instructed in Swahili. They were told that using Swahili as
the medium of instruction aided the comprehension of basic concepts.
And now officials of the Ghana Education Service feel a similar policy
would work here as well.

They forget that in Kenya, Swahili is an official language. Every
national document written in English has a Swahili equivalent.
Newspapers have Swahili versions. Swahili is a language everyone
speaks and so for Kenyans, it is so easy to draw up a uniform code of
instruction for teachers to follow. As a result, if, for example, a
child moves from one end of the country to another, say because his
parents have been transferred, it’s easy for him to pick up from where
he left off in the previous town. It’s even easier for them because
they do not need to print textbooks in various languages.

Here in Ghana, however, there are more than 40 local languages. It
will be very costly – impossible, in other words – to draw up a
uniform code of instruction. Even with donor money, the nation cannot
afford to print about 40 different versions of each textbook to be
used at the lower primary level. Imagine a situation where a child
moves from Accra – where Ga is supposed to be the medium of
instruction – to, say, Dzodze, where they teach in Ewe. How on earth
is he going to learn anything in the new language? This new policy
will also affect teacher transfers. You can’t transfer a
Fante-speaking teacher to Prampram if he’s supposed to be using Ga
Dangbe to teach at his new posting. In a country with a shortage of
teachers as severe as the one we have in Ghana, this should not be the
case. The GES should be able to move its teachers around as much as
possible without restricting even a single one of them on the basis of
an inability to speak a specific local language.

Finally, this policy of instructing pupils at the lower level is being
introduced at a time when there is serious concern about the quality
of spoken and written English in Ghana. If the GES adamantly proceeds
to implement this policy, the problem will get worse – not better. If
those who were introduced to the English language much earlier in life
cannot speak and write it so well, how does anyone expect those who
get a late introduction to do better? The new policy might sound like
a good idea on paper (especially, in a place like Kenya) but it’s a
very bad one for Ghana. It won’t work – not until Ghana has adopted a
second national language and developed it as such. Twi should be the
obvious choice. But any attempt to make Twi a national language will
be fiercely resisted even though it’s a language spoken as widely in
Ho as in Kumasi.

This new language policy is yet another dangerous experiment the
Ghanaian education system can very conveniently do without. If the
authorities insist, however, on going ahead with it, they should first
be able to produce evidence that the use English as a medium of
instruction in the first years of school is harmful.

http://news.myjoyonline.com/features/200912/38664.asp
-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents.
Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal.
(H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************

_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list