[lg policy] Finland: Professor: New methods to be introduced in language teaching: English dominates choices among pupils

[Harold Schiffman]

Professor: New methods to be introduced in language teaching: English
dominates choices among pupils


It is high time to test new methods in language teaching, says
professor Minna-Riitta Luukka from the Department of Languages at the
University of Jyväskylä.

The language skills of Finns are becoming increasingly narrow and
one-sided: Finns are satisfactorily proficient only in English, while
their Swedish skills are weak. When it comes to German, Russian or
French, many students are no longer found at the university level.

      In 2007, more than 90% of pupils in Finnish comprehensive
schools chose English as their first foreign language (A1), which they
normally start studying in the 3rd grade.
      Only 25% of pupils studied a voluntary A2 language in the 5th
grade, and only 6% of them had chosen German as their A2 language.
      The studies of the "B language" or the second native language,
which everybody has to learn, begin in the 7th grade.
      Only 13% of pupils study an optional B2 language in upper
grades. The proportion of German is 6%, that of French is 5%, while
only 0.6% of pupils study Russian.

One method to expand the language reserves and to increase pupils’
motivation to study even so-called uncommon languages would be to
introduce language immersion already in daycare centres and lower
grades.

      The purpose of language immersion is to surround pupils by the
foreign language. Language immersion can be either partial or total.
      In partial immersion, part of the class time is spent learning a
subject matter in the foreign language.
      In total immersion, almost 100% of class time is spent in the
foreign language.
      ”Pupils need incentives and opening paths that would make it
easier to revert to a language even later on”, Luukka notes.
      In Luukka’s opinion, the time spent learning other school
subjects in the foreign language should be increased.

Municipalities should set up tenures for circulating language techers
and to increase all kinds of cooperation and to invest for example in
online teaching in order to be able to afford to teach even small
groups. Another stronger and politically sensitive method would be to
make the current language supply more optional, at which point one is
facing the hot-button fact that Swedish is currently a mandatory
school subject for Finnish-speaking pupils.

Mandatory Swedish has been criticised by Pentti Hyttinen, the
Executive Director of the Regional Council of North Karelia, who
recently demanded in Helsingin Sanomat that the status of Russian in
Finnish schools should be improved. According to Hyttinen, Finnish
schools should introduce mandatory Russian beside enforced Swedish.
However, Finland’s language policy recommendations have proposed only
alternative models. One of them would allow pupils themselves to
choose all languages they would like to study at a comprehensive
school.

      According to another alternative, a pupil could replace Swedish
by the language of another neighbouring country, including Norwegian,
Russian, or Estonian.
      Nevertheless, the Ministry of Education has rejected such
applications so far.
      The Swedish Teachers’ Association in Finland proposed recently
to Timo Lankinen, the Director General of the Finnish National Board
of Education, that the teaching of Swedish should be started already
in the 5th grade in order to improve the results.
      Lankinen is the chair of a working group currently discussing
the framework on division into lessons in comprehensive schools. The
work is expected to be completed by next spring.

The Federation of Foreign Language Teachers in Finland (SUKOL) has
proposed that it would be the subjective right of all pupils in
comprehensive schools to study a minimum of two foreign languages as
well as the other native language.

http://www.hs.fi/english/article/Professor+New+methods+to+be+introduced+in+language+teaching/1135250158158

-- 
**************************************
N.b.: Listing on the lgpolicy-list is merely intended as a service to
its members
and implies neither approval, confirmation nor agreement by the owner
or sponsor of the list as to the veracity of a message's contents.
Members who disagree with a message are encouraged to post a rebuttal.
(H. Schiffman, Moderator)

For more information about the lgpolicy-list, go to
https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/
listinfo/lgpolicy-list
*******************************************

_______________________________________________
This message came to you by way of the lgpolicy-list mailing list
lgpolicy-list at groups.sas.upenn.edu
To manage your subscription unsubscribe, or arrange digest format: https://groups.sas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/lgpolicy-list